Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Comparative Analysis of Power Consumption in LTE, 5G-NSA, 5G-SA, and Private 5G Networks

  • Norwegian University of Science and Technology
  • Technical University of Denmark

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Article in proceedings › Research › peer-review

Abstract

This paper compares the power consumption of Long-Term Evolution (LTE), 5G Non-Standalone (5G-NSA), 5G-Standalone (5G-SA), and private 5G-SA networks at two locations. Our findings reveal that 5G-NSA consumes 92% to 111% more energy than LTE, while 5G-SA consumes 79% more. Although 5G-SA is 6.5% more efficient than 5G-NSA, both are less efficient than LTE. Notably, private 5G-SA is 63% more energy-efficient than public 5G-SA. These results highlight the need for optimized network design and technology selection based on specific use case requirements to ensure energy-efficient mobile communication.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of IEEE 22nd Consumer Communications & Networking Conference (CCNC 2025)
PublisherIEEE
Publication date2025
Pages1-2
Article number10976187
ISBN (Print)979-8-3315-0806-7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2025
Event2025 IEEE 22nd Consumer Communications & Networking Conference  - Flamingo Las Vegas Hotel & Casino, Las Vegas, United States
Duration: 10 Jan 2025 → 13 Jan 2025

Conference

Conference2025 IEEE 22nd Consumer Communications & Networking Conference 
LocationFlamingo Las Vegas Hotel & Casino
Country/TerritoryUnited States
CityLas Vegas
Period10/01/2025 → 13/01/2025

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 7 - Affordable and Clean Energy
    SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy

Keywords

  • Power demand
  • 5G mobile communication
  • Energy efficiency
  • Long Term Evolution

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparative Analysis of Power Consumption in LTE, 5G-NSA, 5G-SA, and Private 5G Networks'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this