The ICES Workshop on Emerging Mollusc Pathogens addressed fundamental questions regarding capabilities (expertise, infrastructure) and communication (among the pathology community, regulation, and industry). We sought to identify areas warranting investment and support to manage emerging diseases in shellfish aquaculture industries, and to provide justification for resources to be directed to these areas for more effective management of shellfish health. Thirty-six priorities were identified spanning four areas: i) improving communication and frameworks; ii) essential infrastructure and expertise; iii) key research priorities; and iv) the central role of husbandry in shellfish aquaculture health management. Improving communication in every regard was recognized as the greatest need. Better coordinating efforts, improving data sharing, and improving trust on the part of industry to create buy-in and improve reporting were among identified priorities. Regulatory frameworks were recognized as needing to be flexible, given the often urgent need to act with incomplete information when a disease emerges.
For essential infrastructure and expertise the workshop emphasized the continued importance of traditional fields such as pathology, bacteriology and virology, which remain foundational to aquaculture health management. Maintaining laboratory capacity is critical, in distribution as well as technologically: there is value in maintaining not just national or pan-national laboratories but provincial governmental and academic labs too, which can be more intimately engaged with local producers, and familiar with local environments. Disease challenge models and facilities were additionally identified as essential for testing hypotheses, as was expertise in epidemiology, which is sharply limited for marine systems.
Discussion of key research priorities highlighted the value of long-term studies for understanding infection patterns; for appreciating dynamics like resistance and tolerance evolution versus virulence evolution; and for understanding effects of changing environments. The importance of improving ecological and evolutionary perspective in general was emphasized, as was the need to develop strategies for monitoring the diversity of potential pathogens. Establishment of mol-luscan cell lines for viral work would be a particularly valuable tool.
Aquatic animal husbandry offers myriad opportunities to control pathogens. Understanding inter-sections of disease with aquaculture production for different host-pathogen systems requires continued research investment. Focused investment is also required to pursue strategies emerging from this research, including disease resistance breeding. Tighter collaboration among practical aquaculture scientists and breeders and pathologists should be promoted.
Finally, funding was recognised as a continuing challenge. Priorities of donors and funding agencies do not always match commercial and health management priorities; basic surveillance is a key area difficult to support. Short funding timelines challenge our ability to address key questions and challenges, including breeding to control diseases. And there is little funding for truly trans-national, collaborative research. Managing diseases to support aquaculture growth is a global problem that demands science that is equally global, which requires the capacity to build broad international collaborations. It would be immensely beneficial for sustainable aquaculture development if trans-national research initiatives in aquatic animal health and other aquaculture related fields could be established to support innovation in this area in the future.
|Publisher||International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES)|
|Number of pages||27|
|Publication status||Published - 2019|
|Series||ICES Scientific Report|