Which role for Life Cycle Thinking in the definition of meaningful indicators for the circular economy?

Monia Niero

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingArticle in proceedingsResearchpeer-review

    293 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    There is an urgent need to provide companies with guidance on how to measure the performance of their products and activities in the implementation of circular economy (CE) strategies. This paper aims to contribute to the discussion on the identification of the most suited metrics for CE at the micro level. We discuss the role of Life Cycle Thinking (LCT) in the development of meaningful circularity indicators at the product level taking into account the absolute perspective on CE. Our analysis is limited to the environmental aspect of sustainability with a focus on the climate change impact. We use a case study of an aluminium can to illustrate the challenges arising from the use of some of the available metrics either directly or indirectly based on LCT, i.e. the Material Circularity Indicator and the Materials Reutilization Score for the product and the Sectorial Decarbonization Approach at the corporate level.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationProceedings of Italian LCA Network conference XI
    Publication date2017
    Pages11-19
    Publication statusPublished - 2017
    EventAtti del XI Convegno della Rete Italiana LCA - Siena, Italy
    Duration: 22 Jun 201723 Jun 2017
    Conference number: 11

    Conference

    ConferenceAtti del XI Convegno della Rete Italiana LCA
    Number11
    Country/TerritoryItaly
    CitySiena
    Period22/06/201723/06/2017

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Which role for Life Cycle Thinking in the definition of meaningful indicators for the circular economy?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this