Which Computational Methods Are Good for Analyzing Large Photonic Crystal Membrane Cavities?

Radu Malureanu, Jakob Rosenkrantz de Lasson, Lars Hagedorn Frandsen, Philipp Gutsche, Sven Burger, Oleksiy S. Kim, Olav Breinbjerg, Aliaksandra Ivinskaya, Fengwen Wang, Ole Sigmund, Teppo Häyrynen, Andrei Lavrinenko, Jesper Mørk, Niels Gregersen

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingArticle in proceedingsResearchpeer-review

214 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

By introducing defects into an otherwise periodic photonic crystal lattice, high quality (Q) factor cavities may be formed. However, the size and the lack of simplifying symmetries in the photonic crystal membrane make these types of cavities exceptionally hard to analyze using numerical simulation methods. In this work, we consider
two different line defect cavities and we compute their Q factors using state-of-the-art optical simulation tools. We show that certain simulation methods perform much better than others in the analysis of these challenging structures.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of the 20th Anniversary International Conference on Transparent Optical Networks
Number of pages4
PublisherIEEE
Publication date2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018
Event20th Anniversary International Conference on Transparent Optical Networks - University Politehnica Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania
Duration: 1 Jul 20185 Jul 2018
http://icton2018.upb.ro/

Conference

Conference20th Anniversary International Conference on Transparent Optical Networks
LocationUniversity Politehnica Bucharest
CountryRomania
CityBucharest
Period01/07/201805/07/2018
Internet address

Keywords

  • Photonic crystal
  • Microcavity
  • Line defect cavity
  • Quality factor
  • Numerical simulations

Cite this

Malureanu, R., de Lasson, J. R., Frandsen, L. H., Gutsche, P., Burger, S., Kim, O. S., ... Gregersen, N. (2018). Which Computational Methods Are Good for Analyzing Large Photonic Crystal Membrane Cavities? In Proceedings of the 20th Anniversary International Conference on Transparent Optical Networks IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTON.2018.8473951
Malureanu, Radu ; de Lasson, Jakob Rosenkrantz ; Frandsen, Lars Hagedorn ; Gutsche, Philipp ; Burger, Sven ; Kim, Oleksiy S. ; Breinbjerg, Olav ; Ivinskaya, Aliaksandra ; Wang, Fengwen ; Sigmund, Ole ; Häyrynen, Teppo ; Lavrinenko, Andrei ; Mørk, Jesper ; Gregersen, Niels. / Which Computational Methods Are Good for Analyzing Large Photonic Crystal Membrane Cavities?. Proceedings of the 20th Anniversary International Conference on Transparent Optical Networks. IEEE, 2018.
@inproceedings{afffa3a747644e18b657f06ba2b03da3,
title = "Which Computational Methods Are Good for Analyzing Large Photonic Crystal Membrane Cavities?",
abstract = "By introducing defects into an otherwise periodic photonic crystal lattice, high quality (Q) factor cavities may be formed. However, the size and the lack of simplifying symmetries in the photonic crystal membrane make these types of cavities exceptionally hard to analyze using numerical simulation methods. In this work, we considertwo different line defect cavities and we compute their Q factors using state-of-the-art optical simulation tools. We show that certain simulation methods perform much better than others in the analysis of these challenging structures.",
keywords = "Photonic crystal, Microcavity, Line defect cavity, Quality factor, Numerical simulations",
author = "Radu Malureanu and {de Lasson}, {Jakob Rosenkrantz} and Frandsen, {Lars Hagedorn} and Philipp Gutsche and Sven Burger and Kim, {Oleksiy S.} and Olav Breinbjerg and Aliaksandra Ivinskaya and Fengwen Wang and Ole Sigmund and Teppo H{\"a}yrynen and Andrei Lavrinenko and Jesper M{\o}rk and Niels Gregersen",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1109/ICTON.2018.8473951",
language = "English",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the 20th Anniversary International Conference on Transparent Optical Networks",
publisher = "IEEE",
address = "United States",

}

Malureanu, R, de Lasson, JR, Frandsen, LH, Gutsche, P, Burger, S, Kim, OS, Breinbjerg, O, Ivinskaya, A, Wang, F, Sigmund, O, Häyrynen, T, Lavrinenko, A, Mørk, J & Gregersen, N 2018, Which Computational Methods Are Good for Analyzing Large Photonic Crystal Membrane Cavities? in Proceedings of the 20th Anniversary International Conference on Transparent Optical Networks. IEEE, 20th Anniversary International Conference on Transparent Optical Networks, Bucharest, Romania, 01/07/2018. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTON.2018.8473951

Which Computational Methods Are Good for Analyzing Large Photonic Crystal Membrane Cavities? / Malureanu, Radu; de Lasson, Jakob Rosenkrantz; Frandsen, Lars Hagedorn; Gutsche, Philipp; Burger, Sven; Kim, Oleksiy S.; Breinbjerg, Olav; Ivinskaya, Aliaksandra; Wang, Fengwen; Sigmund, Ole; Häyrynen, Teppo; Lavrinenko, Andrei; Mørk, Jesper; Gregersen, Niels.

Proceedings of the 20th Anniversary International Conference on Transparent Optical Networks. IEEE, 2018.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingArticle in proceedingsResearchpeer-review

TY - GEN

T1 - Which Computational Methods Are Good for Analyzing Large Photonic Crystal Membrane Cavities?

AU - Malureanu, Radu

AU - de Lasson, Jakob Rosenkrantz

AU - Frandsen, Lars Hagedorn

AU - Gutsche, Philipp

AU - Burger, Sven

AU - Kim, Oleksiy S.

AU - Breinbjerg, Olav

AU - Ivinskaya, Aliaksandra

AU - Wang, Fengwen

AU - Sigmund, Ole

AU - Häyrynen, Teppo

AU - Lavrinenko, Andrei

AU - Mørk, Jesper

AU - Gregersen, Niels

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - By introducing defects into an otherwise periodic photonic crystal lattice, high quality (Q) factor cavities may be formed. However, the size and the lack of simplifying symmetries in the photonic crystal membrane make these types of cavities exceptionally hard to analyze using numerical simulation methods. In this work, we considertwo different line defect cavities and we compute their Q factors using state-of-the-art optical simulation tools. We show that certain simulation methods perform much better than others in the analysis of these challenging structures.

AB - By introducing defects into an otherwise periodic photonic crystal lattice, high quality (Q) factor cavities may be formed. However, the size and the lack of simplifying symmetries in the photonic crystal membrane make these types of cavities exceptionally hard to analyze using numerical simulation methods. In this work, we considertwo different line defect cavities and we compute their Q factors using state-of-the-art optical simulation tools. We show that certain simulation methods perform much better than others in the analysis of these challenging structures.

KW - Photonic crystal

KW - Microcavity

KW - Line defect cavity

KW - Quality factor

KW - Numerical simulations

U2 - 10.1109/ICTON.2018.8473951

DO - 10.1109/ICTON.2018.8473951

M3 - Article in proceedings

BT - Proceedings of the 20th Anniversary International Conference on Transparent Optical Networks

PB - IEEE

ER -

Malureanu R, de Lasson JR, Frandsen LH, Gutsche P, Burger S, Kim OS et al. Which Computational Methods Are Good for Analyzing Large Photonic Crystal Membrane Cavities? In Proceedings of the 20th Anniversary International Conference on Transparent Optical Networks. IEEE. 2018 https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTON.2018.8473951