Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Weak hard X-ray emission from two broad absorption line quasars observed with NuSTAR: Compton-thick absorption or intrinsic X-ray weakness?

  • B. Luo
  • , W. N. Brandt
  • , D. M. Alexander
  • , F. A. Harrison
  • , D. Stern
  • , F. E. Bauer
  • , S. E. Boggs
  • , Finn Erland Christensen
  • , A. Comastri
  • , W. W. Craig
  • , A. C. Fabian
  • , D. Farrah
  • , F. Fiore
  • , F. Fuerst
  • , B. W. Grefenstette
  • , C. J. Hailey
  • , R. Hickox
  • , K. K. Madsen
  • , G. Matt
  • , P. Ogle
  • G. Risaliti, C. Saez, S. H. Teng, D. J. Walton, W. W. Zhang
    • Pennsylvania State University
    • Durham University
    • California Institute of Technology
    • Pontifícia Universidade Católica
    • University of California at San Diego
    • National Institute for Astrophysics
    • Institute of Astronomy
    • Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
    • Osservatorio Astronomico di Roma
    • Columbia University
    • Università Roma Tre
    • NASA Goddard Space Flight Center

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

    404 Downloads (Orbit)

    Abstract

    We present Nuclear Spectroscopic Telescope Array (NuSTAR) hard X-ray observations of two X-ray weak broad absorption line (BAL) quasars, PG 1004+130 (radio loud) and PG 1700+518 (radio quiet). Many BAL quasars appear X-ray weak, probably due to absorption by the shielding gas between the nucleus and the accretion-disk wind. The two targets are among the optically brightest BAL quasars, yet they are known to be significantly X-ray weak at rest-frame 2-10 keV (16-120 times fainter than typical quasars). We would expect to obtain ≈ 400-600 hard X-ray (≳ 10 keV) photons with NuSTAR, provided that these photons are not significantly absorbed (NH ≲ 1024 cm-2). However, both BAL quasars are only detected in the softer NuSTAR bands (e.g., 4-20 keV) but not in its harder bands (e.g., 20-30 keV), suggesting that either the shielding gas is highly Compton-thick or the two targets are intrinsically X-ray weak. We constrain the column densities for both to be NH ≈ 7 × 1024 cm-2 if the weak hard X-ray emission is caused by obscuration from the shielding gas. We discuss a few possibilities for how PG 1004+130 could have Compton-thick shielding gas without strong Fe Kα line emission; dilution from jet-linked X-ray emission is one likely explanation. We also discuss the intrinsic X-ray weakness scenario based on a coronal-quenching model relevant to the shielding gas and disk wind of BAL quasars. Motivated by our NuSTAR results, we perform a Chandra stacking analysis with the Large Bright Quasar Survey BAL quasar sample and place statistical constraints upon the fraction of intrinsically X-ray weak BAL quasars; this fraction is likely 17%-40%.
    Original languageEnglish
    JournalAstrophysical Journal
    Volume772
    Issue number2
    Pages (from-to)153
    Number of pages17
    ISSN0004-637X
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2013

    Keywords

    • Accretion, accretion disks
    • Galaxies: active
    • Galaxies: nuclei
    • Quasars: absorption lines
    • Quasars: emission lines
    • X-rays: general

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Weak hard X-ray emission from two broad absorption line quasars observed with NuSTAR: Compton-thick absorption or intrinsic X-ray weakness?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this