Water softeners add comfort and consume water – comparison of selected centralised and decentralised softening technologies

Camilla Tang*, Cornelis Wilhelmus Adrianus Maria Merks, Hans-Jørgen Albrechtsen

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Selected technologies for centralised or decentralised drinking water softening were evaluated based on technical, economic, environmental and aesthetic indicators to identify the optimal treatment technology for a given setting. To achieve this, we demonstrated that a number of important indicators beyond hardness reduction and costs have to be included. All the evaluated centralised softening technologies could reduce water hardness to the target of 1.3 mmol/L at the Dutch drinking water treatment plant Beilen. CARIX® treatment and pellet softening with Ca(OH)2 resulted in a lower CCPP90 (0.25–0.30 mmol/L) than nanofiltration (0.30–0.35 mmol/L). Decentralised reverse osmosis had a water consumption of >100%, whereas decentralised cation exchange had a water consumption of 2.5–4.5% which was comparable to centralised pellet softening (3.6%). Except for the electronic water conditioner that does not remove water hardness, the decentralised technologies were 7–10 times more expensive than the centralised technologies per m3 of softened water. The centralised softening technologies furthermore ensured supply of softened water to all customers in a water supply zone. Thus, in areas with hard water and limescale problems, investment in centralised softening at the local water utility is more optimal than widespread implementation of decentralised systems.
Original languageEnglish
JournalWater Science and Technology: Water Supply
Volume19
Issue number7
Pages (from-to)2088-2097
ISSN1606-9749
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Cite this

@article{e01eba2490a141229a6c5c408762f0ed,
title = "Water softeners add comfort and consume water – comparison of selected centralised and decentralised softening technologies",
abstract = "Selected technologies for centralised or decentralised drinking water softening were evaluated based on technical, economic, environmental and aesthetic indicators to identify the optimal treatment technology for a given setting. To achieve this, we demonstrated that a number of important indicators beyond hardness reduction and costs have to be included. All the evaluated centralised softening technologies could reduce water hardness to the target of 1.3 mmol/L at the Dutch drinking water treatment plant Beilen. CARIX{\circledR} treatment and pellet softening with Ca(OH)2 resulted in a lower CCPP90 (0.25–0.30 mmol/L) than nanofiltration (0.30–0.35 mmol/L). Decentralised reverse osmosis had a water consumption of >100{\%}, whereas decentralised cation exchange had a water consumption of 2.5–4.5{\%} which was comparable to centralised pellet softening (3.6{\%}). Except for the electronic water conditioner that does not remove water hardness, the decentralised technologies were 7–10 times more expensive than the centralised technologies per m3 of softened water. The centralised softening technologies furthermore ensured supply of softened water to all customers in a water supply zone. Thus, in areas with hard water and limescale problems, investment in centralised softening at the local water utility is more optimal than widespread implementation of decentralised systems.",
author = "Camilla Tang and Merks, {Cornelis Wilhelmus Adrianus Maria} and Hans-J{\o}rgen Albrechtsen",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.2166/ws.2019.088",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "2088--2097",
journal = "Water Science and Technology: Water Supply",
issn = "1606-9749",
publisher = "I W A Publishing",
number = "7",

}

Water softeners add comfort and consume water – comparison of selected centralised and decentralised softening technologies. / Tang, Camilla; Merks, Cornelis Wilhelmus Adrianus Maria; Albrechtsen, Hans-Jørgen.

In: Water Science and Technology: Water Supply, Vol. 19, No. 7, 2019, p. 2088-2097.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Water softeners add comfort and consume water – comparison of selected centralised and decentralised softening technologies

AU - Tang, Camilla

AU - Merks, Cornelis Wilhelmus Adrianus Maria

AU - Albrechtsen, Hans-Jørgen

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Selected technologies for centralised or decentralised drinking water softening were evaluated based on technical, economic, environmental and aesthetic indicators to identify the optimal treatment technology for a given setting. To achieve this, we demonstrated that a number of important indicators beyond hardness reduction and costs have to be included. All the evaluated centralised softening technologies could reduce water hardness to the target of 1.3 mmol/L at the Dutch drinking water treatment plant Beilen. CARIX® treatment and pellet softening with Ca(OH)2 resulted in a lower CCPP90 (0.25–0.30 mmol/L) than nanofiltration (0.30–0.35 mmol/L). Decentralised reverse osmosis had a water consumption of >100%, whereas decentralised cation exchange had a water consumption of 2.5–4.5% which was comparable to centralised pellet softening (3.6%). Except for the electronic water conditioner that does not remove water hardness, the decentralised technologies were 7–10 times more expensive than the centralised technologies per m3 of softened water. The centralised softening technologies furthermore ensured supply of softened water to all customers in a water supply zone. Thus, in areas with hard water and limescale problems, investment in centralised softening at the local water utility is more optimal than widespread implementation of decentralised systems.

AB - Selected technologies for centralised or decentralised drinking water softening were evaluated based on technical, economic, environmental and aesthetic indicators to identify the optimal treatment technology for a given setting. To achieve this, we demonstrated that a number of important indicators beyond hardness reduction and costs have to be included. All the evaluated centralised softening technologies could reduce water hardness to the target of 1.3 mmol/L at the Dutch drinking water treatment plant Beilen. CARIX® treatment and pellet softening with Ca(OH)2 resulted in a lower CCPP90 (0.25–0.30 mmol/L) than nanofiltration (0.30–0.35 mmol/L). Decentralised reverse osmosis had a water consumption of >100%, whereas decentralised cation exchange had a water consumption of 2.5–4.5% which was comparable to centralised pellet softening (3.6%). Except for the electronic water conditioner that does not remove water hardness, the decentralised technologies were 7–10 times more expensive than the centralised technologies per m3 of softened water. The centralised softening technologies furthermore ensured supply of softened water to all customers in a water supply zone. Thus, in areas with hard water and limescale problems, investment in centralised softening at the local water utility is more optimal than widespread implementation of decentralised systems.

U2 - 10.2166/ws.2019.088

DO - 10.2166/ws.2019.088

M3 - Journal article

VL - 19

SP - 2088

EP - 2097

JO - Water Science and Technology: Water Supply

JF - Water Science and Technology: Water Supply

SN - 1606-9749

IS - 7

ER -