Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Waste prevention for sustainable resource and waste management

  • Shin-Ichi Sakai
  • , Junya Yano
  • , Yasuhiro Hirai
  • , Misuzu Asari
  • , Ritsuki Yanagawa
  • , Takeshi Matsuda
  • , Hideto Yoshida
  • , Tetsuji Yamada
  • , Natsuko Kajiwara
  • , Go Suzuki
  • , Tatsuya Kunisue
  • , Shin Takahashi
  • , Keijiro Tomoda
  • , Joachim Wuttke
  • , Paul Mählitz
  • , Vera Susanne Rotter
  • , Mario Grosso
  • , Thomas Fruergaard Astrup
  • , Julian Cleary
  • , Gil-Jong Oh
  • Lili Liu, Jinhui Li, Hwong-wen Ma, Ngo Kim Chi, Stephen Moore
    • Japan Environment Safety Corporation
    • Environment Policy Bureau
    • National Institute for Environmental Studies
    • Ehime University
    • TOWA Technology Corporation
    • German Environment Agency
    • Technical University of Berlin
    • Polytechnic University of Milan
    • University of Toronto
    • National Institute of Environmental Research
    • Tsinghua University
    • National Taiwan University
    • Vietnamese Academy of Science and Technology
    • University of New South Wales
    • Kyoto University

    Research output: Contribution to journalReviewpeer-review

    915 Downloads (Orbit)

    Abstract

    Although the 2Rs (reduce and reuse) are considered high-priority approaches, there has not been enough quantitative research on effective 2R management. The purpose of this paper is to provide information obtained through the International Workshop in Kyoto, Japan, on 11–13 November 2015, which included invited experts and researchers in several countries who were in charge of 3R policies, and an additional review of 245 previous studies. It was found that, regarding policy development, the decoupling between environmental pressures and economy growth was recognized as an essential step towards a sustainable society. 3R and resource management policies, including waste prevention, will play a crucial role. Approaches using material/substance flow analyses have become sophisticated enough to describe the fate of resources and/or hazardous substances based on human activity and the environment, including the final sink. Life-cycle assessment has also been developed to evaluate waste prevention activities. Regarding target products for waste prevention, food loss is one of the waste fractions with the highest priority because its countermeasures have significant upstream and downstream effects. Persistent organic pollutants and hazardous compounds should also be taken into account in the situation where recycling activities are globally widespread for the promotion of a material-cycling society.
    Original languageEnglish
    JournalJournal of Material Cycles and Waste Management
    Volume19
    Issue number4
    Pages (from-to)1295-1313
    ISSN1438-4957
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2017

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 7 - Affordable and Clean Energy
      SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy
    2. SDG 8 - Decent Work and Economic Growth
      SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
    3. SDG 12 - Responsible Consumption and Production
      SDG 12 Responsible Consumption and Production

    Keywords

    • Waste prevention
    • Resource efficiency
    • Chemical control
    • Material flow analysis (MFA)
    • Life-cycle assessment (LCA)
    • Circular economy
    • Substance flow analysis (SFA)
    • Life-cycle cost (LCC)
    • Review

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Waste prevention for sustainable resource and waste management'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this