Abstract
This paper describes a study to understand the use of analogies by design engineers with different levels of experience. Protocol analyses of twelve design engineers have been analysed to understand the functions and reasoning of the analogies. The protocols are real world data from the aerospace industry. The findings indicate a significant difference in both the functions and reasoning by novices and experienced designers. Novices were found to predominantly transfer information without explicit reference to design issues, whereas experienced designers tended to either solve or identify problems. Experienced designers were found to reason about the function of a component and to some degree the predicted behaviour of the component, whereas the novices seem to lack such reasoning processes.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences Computers & Information in Engineering Conference |
| Place of Publication | New York, NY |
| Publisher | The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) |
| Publication date | 2008 |
| ISBN (Print) | 07-91-83831-5 |
| Publication status | Published - 2008 |
| Event | ASME 2008 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences Computers & Information in Engineering Conference - New York City, United States Duration: 3 Aug 2008 → 6 Aug 2008 |
Conference
| Conference | ASME 2008 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences Computers & Information in Engineering Conference |
|---|---|
| Country/Territory | United States |
| City | New York City |
| Period | 03/08/2008 → 06/08/2008 |
Bibliographical note
Paper no. 49293Keywords
- reasoning
- problem solving
- Analogies