Unit Commitment for Systems With Significant Wind Penetration

Aidan Tuohy, Peter Meibom, E. Denny, M. O'Malley

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

    583 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    The stochastic nature of wind alters the unit commitment and dispatch problem. By accounting for this uncertainty when scheduling the system, more robust schedules are produced, which should, on average, reduce expected costs. In this paper, the effects of stochastic wind and load on the unit commitment and dispatch of power systems with high levels of wind power are examined. By comparing the costs, planned operation and performance of the schedules produced, it is shown that stochastic optimization results in less costly, of the order of 0.25%, and better performing schedules than deterministic optimization. The impact of planning the system more frequently to account for updated wind and load forecasts is then examined. More frequent planning means more up to date forecasts are used, which reduces the need for reserve and increases performance of the schedules. It is shown that mid-merit and peaking units and the interconnection are the most affected parts of the system where uncertainty of wind is concerned.
    Original languageEnglish
    JournalI E E E Transactions on Power Systems
    Volume24
    Issue number2
    Pages (from-to)592-601
    ISSN0885-8950
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2009

    Bibliographical note

    Copyright 2009 IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted. However, permission to reprint/republish this material for advertising or promotional purposes or for creating new collective works for resale or redistribution to servers or lists, or to reuse any copyrighted component of this work in other works must be obtained from the IEEE

    Keywords

    • Energy systems analysis
    • Wind energy

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Unit Commitment for Systems With Significant Wind Penetration'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this