Uniqueness of Finite Element Limit Analysis solutions based on weak form lower and bound methods

Peter Noe Poulsen*, John Forbes Olesen

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Finite Element Limit Analysis (FELA) is increasingly used for calculating the ultimate bearing capacity of structures made of ductile materials. Within FELA for reinforced concrete structures the elements have been based on rigorous lower bound or boundary mixed formulations. The lower bound element formulation may be overly constrained for certain meshes and the dual displacement interpretation may contain spurious modes, moreover the boundary mixed element formulation has an internal equilibrium node with no associated displacement field. Here a consistent and general weak formulation based on virtual work is presented specifically for both the lower and the upper bound problem, and it is shown that they are each others dual ensuring uniqueness of the optimal solution. As a consequence there is no difference between the solutions based on the weak upper and lower bound methods. Here a plane element is presented, with a linear stress variation and a quadratic displacement field, optionally including a concentrated bar element with a linear variation of the normal force. These elements are applied in a verification example and two reinforced concrete examples where they show very good results for both load level, stress distribution and collapse mechanism even for coarse meshes.
Original languageEnglish
Article number112532
JournalInternational Journal of Solids and Structures
Volume286-287
Number of pages11
ISSN0020-7683
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2024

Keywords

  • Finite Element Limit Analysis
  • Lower bound method
  • Rigid plasticity
  • Upper bound method
  • Weak formulation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Uniqueness of Finite Element Limit Analysis solutions based on weak form lower and bound methods'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this