Trends in the detection of aquatic non-indigenous species across global marine, estuarine and freshwater ecosystems: A 50-year perspective

Sarah A. Bailey*, Lyndsay Brown, Marnie L. Campbell, João Canning-Clode, James T. Carlton, Nuno Castro, Paula Chainho, Farrah T. Chan, Joel C. Creed, Amelia Curd, John Darling, Paul Fofonoff, Bella S. Galil, Chad L. Hewitt, Graeme J. Inglis, Inti Keith, Nicholas E. Mandrak, Agnese Marchini, Cynthia H. McKenzie, Anna Occhipinti-AmbrogiHenn Ojaveer, Larissa M. Pires-Teixeira, Tamara B. Robinson, Gregory M. Ruiz, Kimberley Seaward, Evangelina Schwindt, Mikhail O. Son, Thomas W. Therriault, Aibin Zhan

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

38 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Aim: The introduction of aquatic non-indigenous species (ANS) has become a major driver for global changes in species biogeography. We examined spatial patterns and temporal trends of ANS detections since 1965 to inform conservation policy and management.

Location: Global.

Methods: We assembled an extensive dataset of first records of detection of ANS (1965–2015) across 49 aquatic ecosystems, including the (a) year of first collection, (b) population status and (c) potential pathway(s) of introduction. Data were analysed at global and regional levels to assess patterns of detection rate, richness and transport pathways.

Results: An annual mean of 43 (±16 SD) primary detections of ANS occurred—one new detection every 8.4 days for 50 years. The global rate of detections was relatively stable during 1965–1995, but increased rapidly after this time, peaking at roughly 66 primary detections per year during 2005–2010 and then declining marginally. Detection rates were variable within and across regions through time. Arthropods, molluscs and fishes were the most frequently reported ANS. Most ANS were likely introduced as stowaways in ships’ ballast water or biofouling, although direct evidence is typically absent.

Main conclusions: This synthesis highlights the magnitude of recent ANS detections, yet almost certainly represents an underestimate as many ANS go unreported due to limited search effort and diminishing taxonomic expertise. Temporal rates of detection are also confounded by reporting lags, likely contributing to the lower detection rate observed in recent years. There is a critical need to implement standardized, repeated methods across regions and taxa to improve the quality of global-scale comparisons and sustain core measures over longer time-scales. It will be fundamental to fill in knowledge gaps given that invasion data representing broad regions of the world's oceans are not yet readily available and to maintain knowledge pipelines for adaptive management.
Original languageEnglish
JournalDiversity and Distributions
Volume26
Issue number12
Pages (from-to)1780-1797
Number of pages18
ISSN1366-9516
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2020

Keywords

  • Aquatic non-indigenous species
  • Biological invasions
  • Detection rate
  • Inventory
  • Long-term dataset
  • Population status
  • Richness
  • Spatial patterns
  • Temporal trends
  • Transport pathways

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Trends in the detection of aquatic non-indigenous species across global marine, estuarine and freshwater ecosystems: A 50-year perspective'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this