Towards a renewed research agenda in ecotoxicology

Joan Artigas; Gertie Arts; Marc Babut; Anna Barra Caracciolo; Sandrine Charles; Arnaud Chaumot; Bruno Combourieu; Ingela Dahllöf; Denis Despréaux; Benoit Ferrari; Nikolai Friberg; Jeanne Garric; Olivier Geffard; Catherine Gourlay-Francé; Michaela Hein; Morten Hjorth; Martin Krauss; Hendrika J. De Lange; Joost Lahr; Kari K. Lehtonen; Teresa Lettieri; Matthias Liess; Stephen Lofts; Philipp Mayer; Soizic Morin; Albrecht Paschke; Claus Svendsen; Philippe Usseglio-Polatera; Nico van den Brink; Eric Vindimian; Richard Williams

doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2011.08.011

Towards a renewed research agenda in ecotoxicology

Joan Artigas, Gertie Arts, Marc Babut, Anna Barra Caracciolo, Sandrine Charles, Arnaud Chaumot, Bruno Combourieu, Ingela Dahllöf, Denis Despréaux, Benoit Ferrari, Nikolai Friberg, Jeanne Garric, Olivier Geffard, Catherine Gourlay-Francé, Michaela Hein, Morten Hjorth, Martin Krauss, Hendrika J. De Lange, Joost Lahr, Kari K. LehtonenTeresa Lettieri, Matthias Liess, Stephen Lofts, Philipp Mayer, Soizic Morin, Albrecht Paschke, Claus Svendsen, Philippe Usseglio-Polatera, Nico van den Brink, Eric Vindimian, Richard Williams

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Abstract

New concerns about biodiversity, ecosystem services and human health triggered several new regulations increasing the need for sound ecotoxicological risk assessment. The PEER network aims to share its view on the research issues that this challenges. PEER scientists call for an improved biologically relevant exposure assessment. They promote comprehensive effect assessment at several biological levels. Biological traits should be used for Environmental risk assessment (ERA) as promising tools to better understand relationships between structure and functioning of ecosystems. The use of modern high throughput methods could also enhance the amount of data for a better risk assessment. Improved models coping with multiple stressors or biological levels are necessary to answer for a more scientifically based risk assessment. Those methods must be embedded within life cycle analysis or economical models for efficient regulations. Joint research programmes involving humanities with ecological sciences should be developed for a sound risk management. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Original language	English
Journal	Environmental Pollution
Volume	160
Pages (from-to)	201-206
ISSN	0269-7491
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2011.08.011
Publication status	Published - 2012
Externally published	Yes

Keywords

Ecotoxicology
Research policy
Stress ecology
Risk assessment

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

10.1016/j.envpol.2011.08.011

OpenUrl availability

Full text

Cite this

Artigas, J., Arts, G., Babut, M., Caracciolo, A. B., Charles, S., Chaumot, A., Combourieu, B., Dahllöf, I., Despréaux, D., Ferrari, B., Friberg, N., Garric, J., Geffard, O., Gourlay-Francé, C., Hein, M., Hjorth, M., Krauss, M., De Lange, H. J., Lahr, J., ... Williams, R. (2012). Towards a renewed research agenda in ecotoxicology. Environmental Pollution, 160, 201-206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2011.08.011

@article{1f92748095dd4d449c3c25b9720504f4,

title = "Towards a renewed research agenda in ecotoxicology",

abstract = "New concerns about biodiversity, ecosystem services and human health triggered several new regulations increasing the need for sound ecotoxicological risk assessment. The PEER network aims to share its view on the research issues that this challenges. PEER scientists call for an improved biologically relevant exposure assessment. They promote comprehensive effect assessment at several biological levels. Biological traits should be used for Environmental risk assessment (ERA) as promising tools to better understand relationships between structure and functioning of ecosystems. The use of modern high throughput methods could also enhance the amount of data for a better risk assessment. Improved models coping with multiple stressors or biological levels are necessary to answer for a more scientifically based risk assessment. Those methods must be embedded within life cycle analysis or economical models for efficient regulations. Joint research programmes involving humanities with ecological sciences should be developed for a sound risk management. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. ",

keywords = "Ecotoxicology, Research policy, Stress ecology, Risk assessment",

author = "Joan Artigas and Gertie Arts and Marc Babut and Caracciolo, {Anna Barra} and Sandrine Charles and Arnaud Chaumot and Bruno Combourieu and Ingela Dahll{\"o}f and Denis Despr{\'e}aux and Benoit Ferrari and Nikolai Friberg and Jeanne Garric and Olivier Geffard and Catherine Gourlay-Franc{\'e} and Michaela Hein and Morten Hjorth and Martin Krauss and {De Lange}, {Hendrika J.} and Joost Lahr and Lehtonen, {Kari K.} and Teresa Lettieri and Matthias Liess and Stephen Lofts and Philipp Mayer and Soizic Morin and Albrecht Paschke and Claus Svendsen and Philippe Usseglio-Polatera and {van den Brink}, Nico and Eric Vindimian and Richard Williams",

year = "2012",

doi = "10.1016/j.envpol.2011.08.011",

language = "English",

volume = "160",

pages = "201--206",

journal = "Environmental Pollution",

issn = "0269-7491",

publisher = "Pergamon Press",

}

Artigas, J, Arts, G, Babut, M, Caracciolo, AB, Charles, S, Chaumot, A, Combourieu, B, Dahllöf, I, Despréaux, D, Ferrari, B, Friberg, N, Garric, J, Geffard, O, Gourlay-Francé, C, Hein, M, Hjorth, M, Krauss, M, De Lange, HJ, Lahr, J, Lehtonen, KK, Lettieri, T, Liess, M, Lofts, S, Mayer, P, Morin, S, Paschke, A, Svendsen, C, Usseglio-Polatera, P, van den Brink, N, Vindimian, E & Williams, R 2012, 'Towards a renewed research agenda in ecotoxicology', Environmental Pollution, vol. 160, pp. 201-206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2011.08.011

TY - JOUR

T1 - Towards a renewed research agenda in ecotoxicology

AU - Artigas, Joan

AU - Arts, Gertie

AU - Babut, Marc

AU - Caracciolo, Anna Barra

AU - Charles, Sandrine

AU - Chaumot, Arnaud

AU - Combourieu, Bruno

AU - Dahllöf, Ingela

AU - Despréaux, Denis

AU - Ferrari, Benoit

AU - Friberg, Nikolai

AU - Garric, Jeanne

AU - Geffard, Olivier

AU - Gourlay-Francé, Catherine

AU - Hein, Michaela

AU - Hjorth, Morten

AU - Krauss, Martin

AU - De Lange, Hendrika J.

AU - Lahr, Joost

AU - Lehtonen, Kari K.

AU - Lettieri, Teresa

AU - Liess, Matthias

AU - Lofts, Stephen

AU - Mayer, Philipp

AU - Morin, Soizic

AU - Paschke, Albrecht

AU - Svendsen, Claus

AU - Usseglio-Polatera, Philippe

AU - van den Brink, Nico

AU - Vindimian, Eric

AU - Williams, Richard

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - New concerns about biodiversity, ecosystem services and human health triggered several new regulations increasing the need for sound ecotoxicological risk assessment. The PEER network aims to share its view on the research issues that this challenges. PEER scientists call for an improved biologically relevant exposure assessment. They promote comprehensive effect assessment at several biological levels. Biological traits should be used for Environmental risk assessment (ERA) as promising tools to better understand relationships between structure and functioning of ecosystems. The use of modern high throughput methods could also enhance the amount of data for a better risk assessment. Improved models coping with multiple stressors or biological levels are necessary to answer for a more scientifically based risk assessment. Those methods must be embedded within life cycle analysis or economical models for efficient regulations. Joint research programmes involving humanities with ecological sciences should be developed for a sound risk management. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

AB - New concerns about biodiversity, ecosystem services and human health triggered several new regulations increasing the need for sound ecotoxicological risk assessment. The PEER network aims to share its view on the research issues that this challenges. PEER scientists call for an improved biologically relevant exposure assessment. They promote comprehensive effect assessment at several biological levels. Biological traits should be used for Environmental risk assessment (ERA) as promising tools to better understand relationships between structure and functioning of ecosystems. The use of modern high throughput methods could also enhance the amount of data for a better risk assessment. Improved models coping with multiple stressors or biological levels are necessary to answer for a more scientifically based risk assessment. Those methods must be embedded within life cycle analysis or economical models for efficient regulations. Joint research programmes involving humanities with ecological sciences should be developed for a sound risk management. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

KW - Ecotoxicology

KW - Research policy

KW - Stress ecology

KW - Risk assessment

U2 - 10.1016/j.envpol.2011.08.011

DO - 10.1016/j.envpol.2011.08.011

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 22015334

SN - 0269-7491

VL - 160

SP - 201

EP - 206

JO - Environmental Pollution

JF - Environmental Pollution

ER -

Towards a renewed research agenda in ecotoxicology

Abstract

Keywords

UN SDGs

Access to Document

OpenUrl availability

Fingerprint

Cite this