To Split or Not to Split: Characterizing Chemical Pollution Impacts in Aquatic Ecosystems with Species Sensitivity Distributions for Specific Taxonomic Groups

Susan Anyango Oginah*, Leo Posthuma, Michael Hauschild, Jaap Slootweg, Marissa Kosnik, Peter Fantke*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

75 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Bridging applied ecology and ecotoxicology is key to protect ecosystems. These disciplines show a mismatch, especially when evaluating pressures. Contrasting to applied ecology, ecotoxicological impacts are often characterized for whole species assemblages based on Species Sensitivity Distributions (SSDs). SSDs are statistical models describing per chemical across-species sensitivity variation based on laboratory toxicity tests. To assist in the aligning of the disciplines and improve decision-support uses of SSDs, we investigate taxonomic-group-specific SSDs for algae/cyanobacteria/aquatic plants, invertebrates, and vertebrates for 180 chemicals with sufficient test data. We show that splitting improves pollution impact assessments for chemicals with a specific mode of action and, surprisingly, for narcotic chemicals. We provide a framework for splitting SSDs that can be applied to serve in environmental protection, life cycle assessment, and management of freshwater ecosystems. We illustrate that using split SSDs has potentially large implications for the decision-support of SSD-based outputs around the globe.
Original languageEnglish
JournalEnvironmental Science and Technology
Volume57
Issue number39
Pages (from-to)14526-14538
Number of pages13
ISSN0013-936X
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2023

Keywords

  • Freshwater ecosystems
  • Mode of action
  • Ecotoxicity
  • Water Framework Directive
  • Water quality
  • Life cycle impact assessment

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'To Split or Not to Split: Characterizing Chemical Pollution Impacts in Aquatic Ecosystems with Species Sensitivity Distributions for Specific Taxonomic Groups'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this