Abstract
An Artificial Bee Colony algorithm was presented
by Sonmez (StructMultidisc Optim 43:85–97, 2011)
for solving discrete truss design problems. It was numerically
tested on four benchmark examples and concluded
to be robust and efficient. We compare the Artificial Bee
Colony algorithm numerically to three alternative heuristics
on the same benchmark examples. The most advanced
heuristics presented herein find equally good, or better,
designs compared to those presented in Sonmez (Struct
Multidisc Optim 43:85–97, 2011). However, for the largest
benchmark example, we use four orders of magnitude fewer
function evaluations.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization |
| Volume | 44 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| Pages (from-to) | 707 |
| ISSN | 1615-147X |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2011 |
Keywords
- Heuristics
- Minimum weight optimization
- Stress constraints
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'To bee or not to bee—comments on “Discrete optimum design of truss structures using artificial bee colony algorithm”'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver