The role of regional contextual factors for science and technology parks: a conceptual framework

Amonpat Poonjan, Anne Nygaard Tanner*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

519 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Literature on science and technology parks (STPs) lacks a systematic understanding of how regional contextual factors affect the performance of STPs. Most studies focus on park-internal factors and neglect the regional context and connections when evaluating STPs' performance. This paper provides new insight on the role of regional factors for STPs by combining and discussing existing studies on STP performance with literature on regional innovation systems. We conduct an exploratory, systematic literature review of 64 papers that refer to park-external factors in their studies of STP performance. We identify five regional factors (university and research institutes, industrial structure, institutional settings, financial support and urbanization) and assess how these factors have been shown to play a role for STP performance in previous studies. Based on this review, the paper develops a comprehensive framework of how regional contextual factors influence the performance of STPs, which can be used in designing and/or improving STP-performance while taking regional characteristics and needs into consideration. We believe a dynamic and comprehensive understanding of these regional connections can help improve designs of STPs, and thereby their performance.
Original languageEnglish
JournalEuropean Planning Studies
Volume28
Issue number2
Pages (from-to)400-420
ISSN0965-4313
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2020

Keywords

  • Science and technology parks
  • Regional context
  • Systematic literature review
  • Regional innovation systems
  • Multiscalar STI policy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The role of regional contextual factors for science and technology parks: a conceptual framework'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this