TY - JOUR
T1 - The motion of trees in the wind: a data synthesis
AU - Jackson, Toby D.
AU - Sethi, Sarab
AU - Dellwik, Ebba
AU - Angelou, Nikolas
AU - Bunce, Amanda
AU - van Emmerik, Tim
AU - Duperat, Marine
AU - Ruel, Jean-Claude
AU - Wellpott, Axel
AU - Van Bloem, Skip
AU - Achim, Alexis
AU - Kane, Brian
AU - Ciruzzi, Dominick M.
AU - Loheide II, Steven P.
AU - James, Ken
AU - Burcham, Daniel
AU - Moore, John
AU - Schindler, Dirk
AU - Kolbe, Sven
AU - Wiegmann, Kilian
AU - Rudnicki, Mark
AU - Lieffers, Victor J.
AU - Selker, John
AU - Gougherty, Andrew
AU - Newson, Tim
AU - Koeser, Andrew
AU - Miesbauer, Jason
AU - Samelson, Roger
AU - Wagner, Jim
AU - Ambrose, Anthony R.
AU - Detter, Andreas
AU - Rust, Steffen
AU - Coomes, David
AU - Gardiner, Barry
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Interactions between wind and trees control energy exchanges between the atmosphere and forest canopies. This energy exchange can lead to the widespread damage of trees, and wind is a key disturbance agent in many of the world's forests. However, most research on this topic has focused on conifer plantations, where risk management is economically important, rather than broadleaf forests, which dominate the forest carbon cycle. This study brings together tree motion time-series data to systematically evaluate the factors influencing tree responses to wind loading, including data from both broadleaf and coniferous trees in forests and open environments.
We found that the two most descriptive features of tree motion were (a) the fundamental frequency, which is a measure of the speed at which a tree sways and is strongly related to tree height, and (b) the slope of the power spectrum, which is related to the efficiency of energy transfer from wind to trees. Intriguingly, the slope of the power spectrum was found to remain constant from medium to high wind speeds for all trees in this study. This suggests that, contrary to some predictions, damping or amplification mechanisms do not change dramatically at high wind speeds, and therefore wind damage risk is related, relatively simply, to wind speed.
Conifers from forests were distinct from broadleaves in terms of their response to wind loading. Specifically, the fundamental frequency of forest conifers was related to their size according to the cantilever beam model (i.e. vertically distributed mass), whereas broadleaves were better approximated by the simple pendulum model (i.e. dominated by the crown). Forest conifers also had a steeper slope of the power spectrum. We interpret these finding as being strongly related to tree architecture; i.e. conifers generally have a simple shape due to their apical dominance, whereas broadleaves exhibit a much wider range of architectures with more dominant crowns.
AB - Interactions between wind and trees control energy exchanges between the atmosphere and forest canopies. This energy exchange can lead to the widespread damage of trees, and wind is a key disturbance agent in many of the world's forests. However, most research on this topic has focused on conifer plantations, where risk management is economically important, rather than broadleaf forests, which dominate the forest carbon cycle. This study brings together tree motion time-series data to systematically evaluate the factors influencing tree responses to wind loading, including data from both broadleaf and coniferous trees in forests and open environments.
We found that the two most descriptive features of tree motion were (a) the fundamental frequency, which is a measure of the speed at which a tree sways and is strongly related to tree height, and (b) the slope of the power spectrum, which is related to the efficiency of energy transfer from wind to trees. Intriguingly, the slope of the power spectrum was found to remain constant from medium to high wind speeds for all trees in this study. This suggests that, contrary to some predictions, damping or amplification mechanisms do not change dramatically at high wind speeds, and therefore wind damage risk is related, relatively simply, to wind speed.
Conifers from forests were distinct from broadleaves in terms of their response to wind loading. Specifically, the fundamental frequency of forest conifers was related to their size according to the cantilever beam model (i.e. vertically distributed mass), whereas broadleaves were better approximated by the simple pendulum model (i.e. dominated by the crown). Forest conifers also had a steeper slope of the power spectrum. We interpret these finding as being strongly related to tree architecture; i.e. conifers generally have a simple shape due to their apical dominance, whereas broadleaves exhibit a much wider range of architectures with more dominant crowns.
U2 - 10.5194/bg-18-4059-2021
DO - 10.5194/bg-18-4059-2021
M3 - Journal article
SN - 1726-4170
VL - 18
SP - 4059
EP - 4072
JO - Biogeosciences
JF - Biogeosciences
IS - 13
ER -