The local density of optical states of a metasurface

  • Per Lunnemann Hansen
  • , A. Femius Koenderink

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

    556 Downloads (Orbit)

    Abstract

    While metamaterials are often desirable for near-field functions, such as perfect lensing, or cloaking, they are often quantified by their response to plane waves from the far field. Here, we present a theoretical analysis of the local density of states near lattices of discrete magnetic scatterers, i.e., the response to near field excitation by a point source. Based on a pointdipole theory using Ewald summation and an array scanning method, we can swiftly and semi-analytically evaluate the local density of states (LDOS) for magnetoelectric point sources in front of an infinite two-dimensional (2D) lattice composed of arbitrary magnetoelectric dipole scatterers. The method takes into account radiation damping as well as all retarded electrodynamic interactions in a self-consistent manner. We show that a lattice of magnetic scatterers evidences characteristic Drexhage oscillations. However, the oscillations are phase shifted relative to the electrically scattering lattice consistent with the difference expected for reflection off homogeneous magnetic respectively electric mirrors. Furthermore, we identify in which source-surface separation regimes the metasurface may be treated as a homogeneous interface, and in which homogenization fails. A strong frequency and in-plane position dependence of the LDOS close to the lattice reveals coupling to guided modes supported by the lattice.
    Original languageEnglish
    Article number20655
    JournalScientific Reports
    Volume6
    Number of pages10
    ISSN2045-2322
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2016

    Keywords

    • physics.optics
    • MULTIDISCIPLINARY
    • SPONTANEOUS EMISSION
    • QUANTUM DOTS
    • MIRROR
    • DIPOLE

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The local density of optical states of a metasurface'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this