The importance of accounting for the number of co-authors and their order when assessing research performance at the individual level in the life sciences

Giovanni Abramo, Ciriaco Andrea D’Angelo, Francesco Rosati

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

59 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Accurate measurement of research productivity should take account of both the number of co-authors of every scientific work and of the different contributions of the individuals. For researchers in the life sciences, common practice is to indicate such contributions through position in the authors list. In this work, we measure the distortion introduced to bibliometric ranking lists for scientific productivity when the number of co-authors or their position in the list is ignored. The field of observation consists of all Italian university professors working in the life sciences, with scientific production examined over the period 2004–2008. The outcomes of the study lead to a recommendation against using indicators or evaluation methods that ignore the different authors’ contributions to the research results. © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Informetrics
Volume7
Pages (from-to)198– 208
ISSN1751-1577
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Research evaluation
  • Co-authorship
  • Fractional counting
  • Bibliometrics
  • Biology
  • Medicine

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The importance of accounting for the number of co-authors and their order when assessing research performance at the individual level in the life sciences'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this