The impact of a photocatalytic paint on indoor air pollutants: Sensory assessments

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

The ability of a commercial photocatalytically active cement-based paint to improve the perceived air quality was evaluated. The paint was applied to pieces of gypsum board with a total surface area of 13 m2 (23% of the total wall surface). To initiate the photocatalytic activity, the paint was illuminated by bulbs emitting visible/UV light. A mixture of common indoor pollutants, including emissions from chipboard, linoleum and carpet, as well as human bioffluents and isopropanol, were used to test the efficacy of the paint. A sensory panel of 35 subjects assessed the air quality in the test-room once before and twice after a step-change in the room condition (i.e., either a change in the sensory pollution load or the illumination of the paint). Illumination of the paint in the room polluted with building materials significantly decreased the acceptability of the air quality at both 40% (p <0.01) and 95% (p <0.05) of the final steady-state condition. Introduction of bioeffluents significantly affected the perceived air quality only shortly after the step-change (40% steady-state); with non-illuminated paint the acceptability decreased; with illuminated paint the acceptability increased. Emission of isopropanol at 1 cm3/h had no effect on the perceived air quality (both with and without illumination).
Original languageEnglish
JournalBuilding and Environment
Volume57
Pages (from-to)396-402
ISSN0360-1323
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Keywords

  • Air cleaning
  • Photocatalytically active paints
  • Pollution sources
  • Sensory panel

Cite this

@article{bef314d1ebee42d4993a5d78f212c86d,
title = "The impact of a photocatalytic paint on indoor air pollutants: Sensory assessments",
abstract = "The ability of a commercial photocatalytically active cement-based paint to improve the perceived air quality was evaluated. The paint was applied to pieces of gypsum board with a total surface area of 13 m2 (23{\%} of the total wall surface). To initiate the photocatalytic activity, the paint was illuminated by bulbs emitting visible/UV light. A mixture of common indoor pollutants, including emissions from chipboard, linoleum and carpet, as well as human bioffluents and isopropanol, were used to test the efficacy of the paint. A sensory panel of 35 subjects assessed the air quality in the test-room once before and twice after a step-change in the room condition (i.e., either a change in the sensory pollution load or the illumination of the paint). Illumination of the paint in the room polluted with building materials significantly decreased the acceptability of the air quality at both 40{\%} (p <0.01) and 95{\%} (p <0.05) of the final steady-state condition. Introduction of bioeffluents significantly affected the perceived air quality only shortly after the step-change (40{\%} steady-state); with non-illuminated paint the acceptability decreased; with illuminated paint the acceptability increased. Emission of isopropanol at 1 cm3/h had no effect on the perceived air quality (both with and without illumination).",
keywords = "Air cleaning, Photocatalytically active paints, Pollution sources, Sensory panel",
author = "Jakub Kolarik and J{\o}rn Toftum",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1016/j.buildenv.2012.06.010",
language = "English",
volume = "57",
pages = "396--402",
journal = "Building and Environment",
issn = "0360-1323",
publisher = "Pergamon Press",

}

The impact of a photocatalytic paint on indoor air pollutants: Sensory assessments. / Kolarik, Jakub; Toftum, Jørn.

In: Building and Environment, Vol. 57, 2012, p. 396-402.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The impact of a photocatalytic paint on indoor air pollutants: Sensory assessments

AU - Kolarik, Jakub

AU - Toftum, Jørn

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - The ability of a commercial photocatalytically active cement-based paint to improve the perceived air quality was evaluated. The paint was applied to pieces of gypsum board with a total surface area of 13 m2 (23% of the total wall surface). To initiate the photocatalytic activity, the paint was illuminated by bulbs emitting visible/UV light. A mixture of common indoor pollutants, including emissions from chipboard, linoleum and carpet, as well as human bioffluents and isopropanol, were used to test the efficacy of the paint. A sensory panel of 35 subjects assessed the air quality in the test-room once before and twice after a step-change in the room condition (i.e., either a change in the sensory pollution load or the illumination of the paint). Illumination of the paint in the room polluted with building materials significantly decreased the acceptability of the air quality at both 40% (p <0.01) and 95% (p <0.05) of the final steady-state condition. Introduction of bioeffluents significantly affected the perceived air quality only shortly after the step-change (40% steady-state); with non-illuminated paint the acceptability decreased; with illuminated paint the acceptability increased. Emission of isopropanol at 1 cm3/h had no effect on the perceived air quality (both with and without illumination).

AB - The ability of a commercial photocatalytically active cement-based paint to improve the perceived air quality was evaluated. The paint was applied to pieces of gypsum board with a total surface area of 13 m2 (23% of the total wall surface). To initiate the photocatalytic activity, the paint was illuminated by bulbs emitting visible/UV light. A mixture of common indoor pollutants, including emissions from chipboard, linoleum and carpet, as well as human bioffluents and isopropanol, were used to test the efficacy of the paint. A sensory panel of 35 subjects assessed the air quality in the test-room once before and twice after a step-change in the room condition (i.e., either a change in the sensory pollution load or the illumination of the paint). Illumination of the paint in the room polluted with building materials significantly decreased the acceptability of the air quality at both 40% (p <0.01) and 95% (p <0.05) of the final steady-state condition. Introduction of bioeffluents significantly affected the perceived air quality only shortly after the step-change (40% steady-state); with non-illuminated paint the acceptability decreased; with illuminated paint the acceptability increased. Emission of isopropanol at 1 cm3/h had no effect on the perceived air quality (both with and without illumination).

KW - Air cleaning

KW - Photocatalytically active paints

KW - Pollution sources

KW - Sensory panel

U2 - 10.1016/j.buildenv.2012.06.010

DO - 10.1016/j.buildenv.2012.06.010

M3 - Journal article

VL - 57

SP - 396

EP - 402

JO - Building and Environment

JF - Building and Environment

SN - 0360-1323

ER -