The Glasgow consensus on the delineation between pesticide emission inventory and impact assessment for LCA

Ralph K. Rosenbaum, Assumpció Anton, Xavier Bengoa, Anders Bjørn, Richard Brain, Cécile Bulle, Nuno Miguel Dias Cosme, Teunis Johannes Dijkman, Peter Fantke, Mwema Felix

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

    523 Downloads (Pure)


    Pesticides are applied to agricultural fields to optimise crop yield and their global use is substantial. Their consideration in life cycle assessment (LCA) is affected by important inconsistencies between the emission inventory and impact assessment phases of LCA. A clear definition of the delineation between the product system model (life cycle inventory—LCI, technosphere) and the natural environment (life cycle impact assessment—LCIA, ecosphere) is missing and could be established via consensus building.A workshop held in 2013 in Glasgow, UK, had the goal of establishing consensus and creating clear guidelines in the following topics: (1) boundary between emission inventory and impact characterisation model, (2) spatial dimensions and the time periods assumed for the application of substances to open agricultural fields or in greenhouses and (3) emissions to the natural environment and their potential impacts. More than 30 specialists in agrifood LCI, LCIA, risk assessment and ecotoxicology, representing industry, government and academia from 15 countries and four continents, met to discuss and reach consensus. The resulting guidelines target LCA practitioners, data (base) and characterisation method developers, and decision makers.The focus was on defining a clear interface between LCI and LCIA, capable of supporting any goal and scope requirements while avoiding double counting or exclusion of important emission flows/impacts. Consensus was reached accordingly on distinct sets of recommendations for LCI and LCIA, respectively, recommending, for example, that buffer zones should be considered as part of the crop production system and the change in yield be considered. While the spatial dimensions of the field were not fixed, the temporal boundary between dynamic LCI fate modelling and steady-state LCIA fate modelling needs to be defined.For pesticide application, the inventory should report pesticide identification, crop, mass applied per active ingredient, application method or formulation type, presence of buffer zones, location/country, application time before harvest and crop growth stage during application, adherence with Good Agricultural Practice, and whether the field is considered part of the technosphere or the ecosphere. Additionally, emission fractions to environmental media on-field and off-field should be reported. For LCIA, the directly concerned impact categories and a list of relevant fate and exposure processes were identified. Next steps were identified: (1) establishing default emission fractions to environmental media for integration into LCI databases and (2) interaction among impact model developers to extend current methods with new elements/processes mentioned in the recommendations.
    Original languageEnglish
    JournalInternational Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
    Issue number6
    Pages (from-to)765-776
    Number of pages12
    Publication statusPublished - 2015

    Bibliographical note

    The authors are grateful for the financial support provided by Syngenta and the TOX-TRAIN project (EU Grant Agreement no. 285286), which was used for the organisation of the workshop and the open-access publication of this manuscript.


    • HASH(0x40fc658)
    • Consensus
    • Ecosphere
    • Life cycle impact assessment (LCIA)
    • Life cycle inventory (LCI)
    • Pesticides
    • Spatial boundary
    • Technosphere
    • Temporal boundary

    Cite this

    Rosenbaum, R. K., Anton, A., Bengoa, X., Bjørn, A., Brain, R., Bulle, C., Cosme, N. M. D., Dijkman, T. J., Fantke, P., & Felix, M. (2015). The Glasgow consensus on the delineation between pesticide emission inventory and impact assessment for LCA. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 20(6), 765-776.