The forgotten element: Why do we ignore calcium in otolith studies?

Karin E. Limburg*, Yvette Heimbrand, Karin Hüssy, Martina Blass, Jay B. Thomas, Katja Mäkinen, Tomas Næraa

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Typical analyses of otolith microchemistry use calcium, a major constituent, as an internal standard, setting its value as a constant and ignoring any potential variations. In fact, patterns do occur in otolith Ca deposition, as can be observed either by repeating the analysis, by creating two-dimensional maps of Ca, or both. Here we present evidence of Ca variations in fish otoliths from analyses using synchrotron-based scanning X-ray fluorescence microscopy, electron microprobe analysis, and laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS). 2-D maps of otoliths created with LA-ICP-MS indicate that Ca is elevated where especially Zn and P are low, and vice versa, suggesting that spatial variations in protein deposition may affect concentrations of Ca. We encourage others to examine Ca concentrations in their biomineralized samples to check for variations, using LA-ICP-MS and other methods.
Original languageEnglish
Article number107297
JournalFisheries Research
Volume283
Number of pages7
ISSN0165-7836
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2025

Keywords

  • Calcium
  • Internal standard
  • 2-D elemental mapping
  • Multiple analytical approaches

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The forgotten element: Why do we ignore calcium in otolith studies?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this