The Forbidden Signs

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

    Abstract

    While the field of semiotics has been active since it was started by Peirce, it appears like the last decade has been especially productive with a number of important new concepts being developed within the biosemiotics community. The novel concept of the Semiotic scaffold by Hoffmeyer is an important addition that offers insight into the hardware requirements for bio-semiosis. As any type of semiosis must be dependent upon Semiotic scaffolds, I recently argued that the process of semiosis has to be divided into two separate processes of sign establishment and sign interpretation, and that misalignment between the two processes result in faulty sign interpretation and over-signification. Such faulty signs were forbidden in the sign classification system of Peirce, so I defined them as forbidden signs. Here I present an analysis of the forbidden sign categories with examples from Occult semiotics. I also show that biological semiosis offers examples of forbidden signs, where the faulty interpretation of signs may lead to decimation of whole evolutionary lines of organisms. A new concept of Evolutionary memory which is applicable to both human and biological semiosis is explained as the combination of two processes; one leading to diversity generation within semiotic scaffolds followed by a second process of decimation of faulty signs during selection in specific learning environments. The analysis suggests that forbidden signs are always used as early stages in the iterative sign establishment process during semiosis.
    Original languageEnglish
    JournalBiosemiotics
    Volume9
    Issue number3
    Pages (from-to)467-483
    Number of pages17
    ISSN1875-1342
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2016

    Keywords

    • Peirce
    • Semiotic Scaffold
    • Evolutionary Memory
    • Decimation
    • Sign Establishment
    • Bacteria

    Cite this

    Kilstrup, Mogens. / The Forbidden Signs. In: Biosemiotics. 2016 ; Vol. 9, No. 3. pp. 467-483.
    @article{6a9f858fbb65446ea0833b407d4f168e,
    title = "The Forbidden Signs",
    abstract = "While the field of semiotics has been active since it was started by Peirce, it appears like the last decade has been especially productive with a number of important new concepts being developed within the biosemiotics community. The novel concept of the Semiotic scaffold by Hoffmeyer is an important addition that offers insight into the hardware requirements for bio-semiosis. As any type of semiosis must be dependent upon Semiotic scaffolds, I recently argued that the process of semiosis has to be divided into two separate processes of sign establishment and sign interpretation, and that misalignment between the two processes result in faulty sign interpretation and over-signification. Such faulty signs were forbidden in the sign classification system of Peirce, so I defined them as forbidden signs. Here I present an analysis of the forbidden sign categories with examples from Occult semiotics. I also show that biological semiosis offers examples of forbidden signs, where the faulty interpretation of signs may lead to decimation of whole evolutionary lines of organisms. A new concept of Evolutionary memory which is applicable to both human and biological semiosis is explained as the combination of two processes; one leading to diversity generation within semiotic scaffolds followed by a second process of decimation of faulty signs during selection in specific learning environments. The analysis suggests that forbidden signs are always used as early stages in the iterative sign establishment process during semiosis.",
    keywords = "Peirce, Semiotic Scaffold, Evolutionary Memory, Decimation, Sign Establishment, Bacteria",
    author = "Mogens Kilstrup",
    year = "2016",
    doi = "10.1007/s12304-016-9277-0",
    language = "English",
    volume = "9",
    pages = "467--483",
    journal = "Biosemiotics",
    issn = "1875-1342",
    publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
    number = "3",

    }

    The Forbidden Signs. / Kilstrup, Mogens.

    In: Biosemiotics, Vol. 9, No. 3, 2016, p. 467-483.

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - The Forbidden Signs

    AU - Kilstrup, Mogens

    PY - 2016

    Y1 - 2016

    N2 - While the field of semiotics has been active since it was started by Peirce, it appears like the last decade has been especially productive with a number of important new concepts being developed within the biosemiotics community. The novel concept of the Semiotic scaffold by Hoffmeyer is an important addition that offers insight into the hardware requirements for bio-semiosis. As any type of semiosis must be dependent upon Semiotic scaffolds, I recently argued that the process of semiosis has to be divided into two separate processes of sign establishment and sign interpretation, and that misalignment between the two processes result in faulty sign interpretation and over-signification. Such faulty signs were forbidden in the sign classification system of Peirce, so I defined them as forbidden signs. Here I present an analysis of the forbidden sign categories with examples from Occult semiotics. I also show that biological semiosis offers examples of forbidden signs, where the faulty interpretation of signs may lead to decimation of whole evolutionary lines of organisms. A new concept of Evolutionary memory which is applicable to both human and biological semiosis is explained as the combination of two processes; one leading to diversity generation within semiotic scaffolds followed by a second process of decimation of faulty signs during selection in specific learning environments. The analysis suggests that forbidden signs are always used as early stages in the iterative sign establishment process during semiosis.

    AB - While the field of semiotics has been active since it was started by Peirce, it appears like the last decade has been especially productive with a number of important new concepts being developed within the biosemiotics community. The novel concept of the Semiotic scaffold by Hoffmeyer is an important addition that offers insight into the hardware requirements for bio-semiosis. As any type of semiosis must be dependent upon Semiotic scaffolds, I recently argued that the process of semiosis has to be divided into two separate processes of sign establishment and sign interpretation, and that misalignment between the two processes result in faulty sign interpretation and over-signification. Such faulty signs were forbidden in the sign classification system of Peirce, so I defined them as forbidden signs. Here I present an analysis of the forbidden sign categories with examples from Occult semiotics. I also show that biological semiosis offers examples of forbidden signs, where the faulty interpretation of signs may lead to decimation of whole evolutionary lines of organisms. A new concept of Evolutionary memory which is applicable to both human and biological semiosis is explained as the combination of two processes; one leading to diversity generation within semiotic scaffolds followed by a second process of decimation of faulty signs during selection in specific learning environments. The analysis suggests that forbidden signs are always used as early stages in the iterative sign establishment process during semiosis.

    KW - Peirce

    KW - Semiotic Scaffold

    KW - Evolutionary Memory

    KW - Decimation

    KW - Sign Establishment

    KW - Bacteria

    U2 - 10.1007/s12304-016-9277-0

    DO - 10.1007/s12304-016-9277-0

    M3 - Journal article

    VL - 9

    SP - 467

    EP - 483

    JO - Biosemiotics

    JF - Biosemiotics

    SN - 1875-1342

    IS - 3

    ER -