The dynamics of design: Exploring heterogeneity in meso-scale team processes

Philip Cash, Stanko Škec, Mario Štorga

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

There is a critical gap in understanding how meso-scale team processes i.e. interactions between individuals in a team, develop in design teams and specifically how they dynamically balance design/managerial effort. We treat this deficit by contrasting two in-depth cases using work sampling data. We identify a number of contributions. First, we describe how design team processes display both goal/action and temporal heterogeneity. Second, we demonstrate how this heterogeneity is underpinned by common principles that consistently shape team processes in design. Specifically: proportional goal/action composition and recurring process patterns over time. Finally, we describe how these principles can be integrated via ‘archetypal process types’. Together, these substantially extend prior theory and point to specific implications for future design research.
Original languageEnglish
JournalDesign Studies
Volume64
Pages (from-to)124-153
ISSN0142-694X
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Cite this

Cash, Philip ; Škec, Stanko ; Štorga, Mario. / The dynamics of design: Exploring heterogeneity in meso-scale team processes. In: Design Studies. 2019 ; Vol. 64. pp. 124-153.
@article{d97cb328664042e6bb64eebb4873eb5c,
title = "The dynamics of design: Exploring heterogeneity in meso-scale team processes",
abstract = "There is a critical gap in understanding how meso-scale team processes i.e. interactions between individuals in a team, develop in design teams and specifically how they dynamically balance design/managerial effort. We treat this deficit by contrasting two in-depth cases using work sampling data. We identify a number of contributions. First, we describe how design team processes display both goal/action and temporal heterogeneity. Second, we demonstrate how this heterogeneity is underpinned by common principles that consistently shape team processes in design. Specifically: proportional goal/action composition and recurring process patterns over time. Finally, we describe how these principles can be integrated via ‘archetypal process types’. Together, these substantially extend prior theory and point to specific implications for future design research.",
author = "Philip Cash and Stanko Škec and Mario Štorga",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1016/j.destud.2019.08.001",
language = "English",
volume = "64",
pages = "124--153",
journal = "Design Studies",
issn = "0142-694X",
publisher = "Pergamon Press",

}

The dynamics of design: Exploring heterogeneity in meso-scale team processes. / Cash, Philip; Škec, Stanko; Štorga, Mario.

In: Design Studies, Vol. 64, 2019, p. 124-153.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The dynamics of design: Exploring heterogeneity in meso-scale team processes

AU - Cash, Philip

AU - Škec, Stanko

AU - Štorga, Mario

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - There is a critical gap in understanding how meso-scale team processes i.e. interactions between individuals in a team, develop in design teams and specifically how they dynamically balance design/managerial effort. We treat this deficit by contrasting two in-depth cases using work sampling data. We identify a number of contributions. First, we describe how design team processes display both goal/action and temporal heterogeneity. Second, we demonstrate how this heterogeneity is underpinned by common principles that consistently shape team processes in design. Specifically: proportional goal/action composition and recurring process patterns over time. Finally, we describe how these principles can be integrated via ‘archetypal process types’. Together, these substantially extend prior theory and point to specific implications for future design research.

AB - There is a critical gap in understanding how meso-scale team processes i.e. interactions between individuals in a team, develop in design teams and specifically how they dynamically balance design/managerial effort. We treat this deficit by contrasting two in-depth cases using work sampling data. We identify a number of contributions. First, we describe how design team processes display both goal/action and temporal heterogeneity. Second, we demonstrate how this heterogeneity is underpinned by common principles that consistently shape team processes in design. Specifically: proportional goal/action composition and recurring process patterns over time. Finally, we describe how these principles can be integrated via ‘archetypal process types’. Together, these substantially extend prior theory and point to specific implications for future design research.

U2 - 10.1016/j.destud.2019.08.001

DO - 10.1016/j.destud.2019.08.001

M3 - Journal article

VL - 64

SP - 124

EP - 153

JO - Design Studies

JF - Design Studies

SN - 0142-694X

ER -