TY - JOUR
T1 - The dud canard
T2 - Existence of strong canard cycles in R3
AU - Kristiansen, Kristian Uldall
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Author(s)
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - In this paper, we provide a rigorous description of the birth of canard limit cycles in slow-fast systems in R3 through the folded saddle-node of type II and the singular Hopf bifurcation. In particular, we prove – in the analytic case only – that for all 0<ϵ≪1 there is a family of periodic orbits, born in the (singular) Hopf bifurcation and extending to O(1) cycles that follow the strong canard of the folded saddle-node. Our results can be seen as an extension of the canard explosion in R2, but in contrast to the planar case, the family of periodic orbits in R3 is not explosive. For this reason, we have chosen to call the phenomena in R3, the “dud canard”. The main difficulty of the proof lies in connecting the Hopf cycles with the canard cycles, since these are described in different scalings. As in R2, we use blowup to overcome this, but we also have to compensate for the lack of uniformity near the Hopf bifurcation, due to its singular nature; it is a zero-Hopf bifurcation in the limit ϵ=0. In the present paper, we do so by imposing analyticity of the vector-field. This allows us to prove existence of an invariant slow manifold, that is not normally hyperbolic.
AB - In this paper, we provide a rigorous description of the birth of canard limit cycles in slow-fast systems in R3 through the folded saddle-node of type II and the singular Hopf bifurcation. In particular, we prove – in the analytic case only – that for all 0<ϵ≪1 there is a family of periodic orbits, born in the (singular) Hopf bifurcation and extending to O(1) cycles that follow the strong canard of the folded saddle-node. Our results can be seen as an extension of the canard explosion in R2, but in contrast to the planar case, the family of periodic orbits in R3 is not explosive. For this reason, we have chosen to call the phenomena in R3, the “dud canard”. The main difficulty of the proof lies in connecting the Hopf cycles with the canard cycles, since these are described in different scalings. As in R2, we use blowup to overcome this, but we also have to compensate for the lack of uniformity near the Hopf bifurcation, due to its singular nature; it is a zero-Hopf bifurcation in the limit ϵ=0. In the present paper, we do so by imposing analyticity of the vector-field. This allows us to prove existence of an invariant slow manifold, that is not normally hyperbolic.
U2 - 10.1016/j.jde.2023.09.008
DO - 10.1016/j.jde.2023.09.008
M3 - Journal article
AN - SCOPUS:85171589637
SN - 0022-0396
VL - 375
SP - 706
EP - 749
JO - Journal of Differential Equations
JF - Journal of Differential Equations
ER -