The Debye-Hückel theory and its importance in modeling electrolyte solutions

Georgios M. Kontogeorgis*, Bjørn Maribo-Mogensen, Kaj Thomsen

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

A colleague at the Technical University of Denmark has often stated: “Life is too short for electrolytes”. Another well-known scientist in the field of molecular simulation has recently said during an international Thermodynamics conference: “All my life I have tried to keep myself away from water and electrolytes”. Sadly, what these statements correctly imply is that there are far too many unclear questions and concepts in electrolyte thermodynamics, and associated difficulties in modeling electrolyte solutions. In this work, we attempt to shed some light on some important concepts and misconceptions in electrolyte thermodynamics associated with the development of electrolyte equations of state, with emphasis on those based on the Debye-Hückel theory. Detailed mathematics is needed for some of the derivations but for brevity and in order to emphasize the principles rather than the derivations, the latter are omitted. We first discuss the peculiarities of electrolyte thermodynamics and associated modeling and continue with the derivation of the Debye-Hückel theory. The assumptions and limits of application of Debye-Hückel are discussed in particular. Next, the Born term and its significance and implications are presented in more detail. A discussion and outlook section conclude this review. Several of the statements in this work challenge “accepted beliefs” in electrolyte thermodynamics and, while we believe that this challenge is justified, we hope that a useful debate can result in improved and predictive thermodynamic models for electrolyte solutions.
Original languageEnglish
JournalFluid Phase Equilibria
Volume462
Pages (from-to)130-152
ISSN0378-3812
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Keywords

  • Electrolytes
  • CPA
  • SAFT
  • Debye-Huckel
  • Born

Cite this

@article{d9ce1150a7d04de58af7acfba2a88951,
title = "The Debye-H{\"u}ckel theory and its importance in modeling electrolyte solutions",
abstract = "A colleague at the Technical University of Denmark has often stated: “Life is too short for electrolytes”. Another well-known scientist in the field of molecular simulation has recently said during an international Thermodynamics conference: “All my life I have tried to keep myself away from water and electrolytes”. Sadly, what these statements correctly imply is that there are far too many unclear questions and concepts in electrolyte thermodynamics, and associated difficulties in modeling electrolyte solutions. In this work, we attempt to shed some light on some important concepts and misconceptions in electrolyte thermodynamics associated with the development of electrolyte equations of state, with emphasis on those based on the Debye-H{\"u}ckel theory. Detailed mathematics is needed for some of the derivations but for brevity and in order to emphasize the principles rather than the derivations, the latter are omitted. We first discuss the peculiarities of electrolyte thermodynamics and associated modeling and continue with the derivation of the Debye-H{\"u}ckel theory. The assumptions and limits of application of Debye-H{\"u}ckel are discussed in particular. Next, the Born term and its significance and implications are presented in more detail. A discussion and outlook section conclude this review. Several of the statements in this work challenge “accepted beliefs” in electrolyte thermodynamics and, while we believe that this challenge is justified, we hope that a useful debate can result in improved and predictive thermodynamic models for electrolyte solutions.",
keywords = "Electrolytes, CPA, SAFT, Debye-Huckel, Born",
author = "Kontogeorgis, {Georgios M.} and Bj{\o}rn Maribo-Mogensen and Kaj Thomsen",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1016/j.fluid.2018.01.004",
language = "English",
volume = "462",
pages = "130--152",
journal = "Fluid Phase Equilibria",
issn = "0378-3812",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

The Debye-Hückel theory and its importance in modeling electrolyte solutions. / Kontogeorgis, Georgios M.; Maribo-Mogensen, Bjørn; Thomsen, Kaj.

In: Fluid Phase Equilibria, Vol. 462, 2018, p. 130-152.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Debye-Hückel theory and its importance in modeling electrolyte solutions

AU - Kontogeorgis, Georgios M.

AU - Maribo-Mogensen, Bjørn

AU - Thomsen, Kaj

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - A colleague at the Technical University of Denmark has often stated: “Life is too short for electrolytes”. Another well-known scientist in the field of molecular simulation has recently said during an international Thermodynamics conference: “All my life I have tried to keep myself away from water and electrolytes”. Sadly, what these statements correctly imply is that there are far too many unclear questions and concepts in electrolyte thermodynamics, and associated difficulties in modeling electrolyte solutions. In this work, we attempt to shed some light on some important concepts and misconceptions in electrolyte thermodynamics associated with the development of electrolyte equations of state, with emphasis on those based on the Debye-Hückel theory. Detailed mathematics is needed for some of the derivations but for brevity and in order to emphasize the principles rather than the derivations, the latter are omitted. We first discuss the peculiarities of electrolyte thermodynamics and associated modeling and continue with the derivation of the Debye-Hückel theory. The assumptions and limits of application of Debye-Hückel are discussed in particular. Next, the Born term and its significance and implications are presented in more detail. A discussion and outlook section conclude this review. Several of the statements in this work challenge “accepted beliefs” in electrolyte thermodynamics and, while we believe that this challenge is justified, we hope that a useful debate can result in improved and predictive thermodynamic models for electrolyte solutions.

AB - A colleague at the Technical University of Denmark has often stated: “Life is too short for electrolytes”. Another well-known scientist in the field of molecular simulation has recently said during an international Thermodynamics conference: “All my life I have tried to keep myself away from water and electrolytes”. Sadly, what these statements correctly imply is that there are far too many unclear questions and concepts in electrolyte thermodynamics, and associated difficulties in modeling electrolyte solutions. In this work, we attempt to shed some light on some important concepts and misconceptions in electrolyte thermodynamics associated with the development of electrolyte equations of state, with emphasis on those based on the Debye-Hückel theory. Detailed mathematics is needed for some of the derivations but for brevity and in order to emphasize the principles rather than the derivations, the latter are omitted. We first discuss the peculiarities of electrolyte thermodynamics and associated modeling and continue with the derivation of the Debye-Hückel theory. The assumptions and limits of application of Debye-Hückel are discussed in particular. Next, the Born term and its significance and implications are presented in more detail. A discussion and outlook section conclude this review. Several of the statements in this work challenge “accepted beliefs” in electrolyte thermodynamics and, while we believe that this challenge is justified, we hope that a useful debate can result in improved and predictive thermodynamic models for electrolyte solutions.

KW - Electrolytes

KW - CPA

KW - SAFT

KW - Debye-Huckel

KW - Born

U2 - 10.1016/j.fluid.2018.01.004

DO - 10.1016/j.fluid.2018.01.004

M3 - Journal article

VL - 462

SP - 130

EP - 152

JO - Fluid Phase Equilibria

JF - Fluid Phase Equilibria

SN - 0378-3812

ER -