Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The Anti-Amyloid Monoclonal Antibody Lecanemab: 16 Cautionary Notes

  • Kasper P. Kepp*
  • , Stefano L. Sensi
  • , Kasper B. Johnsen
  • , Jorge R. Barrio
  • , Poul F. Høilund-Carlsen
  • , Rachael L. Neve
  • , Abass Alavi
  • , Karl Herrup
  • , George Perry
  • , Nikolaos K. Robakis
  • , Bryce Vissel
  • , Alberto J. Espay
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Gabriele d'Annunzio University
  • Aalborg University
  • University of California at Los Angeles
  • University of Southern Denmark
  • Harvard University
  • University of Pennsylvania
  • University of Pittsburgh
  • University of Texas at San Antonio
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
  • University of New South Wales
  • University of Cincinnati

Research output: Contribution to journalReviewpeer-review

580 Downloads (Orbit)

Abstract

After the CLARITY-AD clinical trial results of lecanemab were interpreted as positive, and supporting the amyloid hypothesis, the drug received accelerated Food and Drug Administration approval. However, we argue that benefits of lecanemab treatment are uncertain and may yield net harm for some patients, and that the data do not support the amyloid hypothesis. We note potential biases from inclusion, unblinding, dropouts, and other issues. Given substantial adverse effects and subgroup heterogeneity, we conclude that lecanemab's efficacy is not clinically meaningful, consistent with numerous analyses suggesting that amyloid-β and its derivatives are not the main causative agents of Alzheimer's disease dementia.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Alzheimer's Disease
Volume94
Issue number2
Pages (from-to)497-507
ISSN1387-2877
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2023

Keywords

  • Alzheimer's disease
  • Amyloid-β
  • Antibody
  • Lecanemab
  • Subgroup analysis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Anti-Amyloid Monoclonal Antibody Lecanemab: 16 Cautionary Notes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this