Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Ten questions concerning autism and auditory accessibility in buildings

  • Bruno S. Masiero*
  • , Fernanda Caldas-Correia
  • , Samuel H. Underwood
  • , Carmen Rosas-Pérez
  • , Alaa Algargoosh
  • , Federica Bettarello
  • , Marco Caniato
  • , William J. Davies
  • , David Manley
  • , Anna Remington
  • , Anjana Sivakumar
  • , Wayne J. Wilson
  • , Luca Zaniboni
  • , Lily M. Wang
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Universidade Estadual de Campinas
  • University of Nebraska-Lincoln
  • University of Edinburgh
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology
  • University of Trieste
  • Stuttgart Technology University of Applied Sciences
  • University of Salford
  • DLR Group
  • University College London
  • University of Queensland

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

61 Downloads (Orbit)

Abstract

The ten questions in this paper discuss how the auditory experience of autistic individuals is related to the built environment, integrating perspectives from practitioners and researchers in acoustical engineering, audiology, soundscapes, psychology, architecture, and indoor environment. Autism is a neurodevelopmental disability associated with, as one of its main characteristics, hypo- or hypersensitivity to sensory stimuli. In the built environment, the sensory profile of autistic individuals is directly impacted by thermal, visual, and (the main topic of this paper) acoustical design. However, research on creating more acoustically-inclusive equipment or spaces for this population is still limited, leading to shortcomings in existing acoustic design standards, which do not consider such sensory processing differences. The paper highlights the limitations of current acoustic standards, which are based on neurotypical hearing models, and advocates for inclusive design practices that prioritize the needs of autistic individuals. We also present the shift from a purely medical model to a more nuanced approach that includes discussing ethical research practices, autism as a social concept, appropriate language, and disability rights. Key recommendations include participatory research, flexible acoustic environments, and the adoption of universal design principles to create spaces that accommodate sensory diversity, ensuring both functionality and well-being.
Original languageEnglish
Article number113634
JournalBuilding and Environment
Volume286
Number of pages14
ISSN0360-1323
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2025

Keywords

  • Indoor environmental quality
  • Acoustics
  • Autism
  • Accessibility
  • Hearing

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Ten questions concerning autism and auditory accessibility in buildings'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this