TY - JOUR
T1 - Taking Another Look at the van der Waals Equation of State – Almost 150 Years Later
AU - Kontogeorgis, Georgios M.
AU - Privat, Romain
AU - Jaubert, Jean-Noël
N1 - This is an open access article published under an ACS AuthorChoice License, which permits copying and redistribution of the article or any adaptations for non-commercial purposes.
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - The
van der Waals (vdW) equation of state has long fascinated researchers
and engineers, largely because of its simplicity and engineering flexibility.
At the same time as vdW and other equations of state (EoS) have been
proposed, at first mostly used for petrochemical applications, solution
theories in the form of activity coefficient models have been developed,
focusing on the accurate representation of the liquid phase, of interest
to the chemical industry. For both the van der Waals (and other cubic
EoS) and the activity coefficient models we can identify size and
energy terms, although different terminologies have been used (e.g.,
combinatorial-free volume, entropic, excess entropy or repulsive terms
on one side and “residual”, energetic, excess energy
or attractive contributions on the other side). These definitions
are not necessarily identical, as it will be shown here, and the identification
of distinct separable contributions in thermodynamic models is not
always straightforward. Moreover, the different traditions lead sometimes
to confusion as to the actual range of applicability of these models,
and it may be useful to consider them (EoS and activity coefficient
models) together. While much has been written about the van der Waals
equation of state, a particular insight is obtained when the model
is expressed in terms of excess Gibbs energy and activity coefficient
expressions. We show that such a transformation, analysis of the distinct
size and energy terms of vdW and comparison to classical solution
theories, provides insight into the physical meaning, capabilities,
and limitations of the model, including the associated mixing and
combining rules used. We will discuss how this analysis of the vdW
and subsequent equations of state, such as the Soave-Redlich-Kwong
and Peng-Robinson, have enhanced our understanding of the actual applicability
range of the models in terms of size effects or excess properties.
The analysis reveals that the capabilities of the vdW and in general
of the vdW-type cubic equations of state are possibly more significant
than traditionally considered, and that the task of more advanced
models in trying to “beat them (the cubic EoS)”, may
be more difficult than previously anticipated.
AB - The
van der Waals (vdW) equation of state has long fascinated researchers
and engineers, largely because of its simplicity and engineering flexibility.
At the same time as vdW and other equations of state (EoS) have been
proposed, at first mostly used for petrochemical applications, solution
theories in the form of activity coefficient models have been developed,
focusing on the accurate representation of the liquid phase, of interest
to the chemical industry. For both the van der Waals (and other cubic
EoS) and the activity coefficient models we can identify size and
energy terms, although different terminologies have been used (e.g.,
combinatorial-free volume, entropic, excess entropy or repulsive terms
on one side and “residual”, energetic, excess energy
or attractive contributions on the other side). These definitions
are not necessarily identical, as it will be shown here, and the identification
of distinct separable contributions in thermodynamic models is not
always straightforward. Moreover, the different traditions lead sometimes
to confusion as to the actual range of applicability of these models,
and it may be useful to consider them (EoS and activity coefficient
models) together. While much has been written about the van der Waals
equation of state, a particular insight is obtained when the model
is expressed in terms of excess Gibbs energy and activity coefficient
expressions. We show that such a transformation, analysis of the distinct
size and energy terms of vdW and comparison to classical solution
theories, provides insight into the physical meaning, capabilities,
and limitations of the model, including the associated mixing and
combining rules used. We will discuss how this analysis of the vdW
and subsequent equations of state, such as the Soave-Redlich-Kwong
and Peng-Robinson, have enhanced our understanding of the actual applicability
range of the models in terms of size effects or excess properties.
The analysis reveals that the capabilities of the vdW and in general
of the vdW-type cubic equations of state are possibly more significant
than traditionally considered, and that the task of more advanced
models in trying to “beat them (the cubic EoS)”, may
be more difficult than previously anticipated.
U2 - 10.1021/acs.jced.9b00264
DO - 10.1021/acs.jced.9b00264
M3 - Journal article
SN - 0021-9568
VL - 64
SP - 4619
EP - 4637
JO - Journal of Chemical and Engineering Data
JF - Journal of Chemical and Engineering Data
IS - 11
ER -