Sustainable nanomaterials? – How to apply “early warning signs” to screen nanomaterials for harmful properties

In 2001 the European Environment Agency (EEA) published a report that analyzed 14 cases of technological developments that later on turned out to have negative side‐effects and they identified 12 “late lessons” for current and future policy‐makers to bear in mind when initiating new technological endeavors. This presentation explores how the first lesson – “Acknowledge and respond to ignorance, uncertainty and risk in technology appraisal” could be applied to screen nanomaterials. In cases of ignorance, uncertainty and risk, the EEA recommends paying particular attention to important warning signs such as novelty, persistency, whether materials are readily dispersed in the environment, and whether they bioaccumulate or lead to potentially irreversible action. Through an analysis of these criteria using five well‐known nanomaterials (titanium dioxide, carbon nanotubes, liposomes, poly(lacticcoglycolic acid) and nanoscale zero‐valent iron), it was found that only nanoTiO2 fulfils all the five criteria. Depending on the length of the nanotubes, carbon nanotubes fulfil 3 or 4 criteria whereas liposomes, poly(lactic‐co‐glycolic acid), nanoscale zero‐valent iron fulfil only one criteria. We will discuss how these warning signs can be used by different stakeholders such as nanomaterial researchers and developers, companies and regulators to design benign nanomaterials, communicate what is known about nano‐risks and decide on whether to implement precautionary regulatory measures.