Subjective Response to Foot-Fall Noise, Including Localization of the Source Position

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

    Abstract

    Although an impact noise level is objectively evaluated the same according to current standards, a lightweight floor structure is often subjectively judged more annoying than a heavy homogeneous structure. The hypothesis of the present investigation is that the subjective judgment of impact noise is more annoying if the source position can be localized; lightweight structures have a more localized radiation than heavy structures. For the heavy structures the reverberant vibration field is dominant, therefore having a distributed radiation. A listening test is used to assess the subjective annoyance, using simulated binaural room impulse responses, with sources being a moving point source or a nonmoving surface source, and rooms being a room with a reverberation time of 0.5 s or an anechoic room. The paper concludes that no strong effect of the source localization on the annoyance can be found.
    Original languageEnglish
    JournalActa Acustica united with Acustica
    Volume97
    Issue number5
    Pages (from-to)904 - 908
    ISSN1610-1928
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2011

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Subjective Response to Foot-Fall Noise, Including Localization of the Source Position'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this