Stability patterns for a size-structured population model and its stage-structured counterpart

In this paper we compare a general size-structured population model, where a size-structured consumer feeds upon an unstructured resource, to its simplified stage-structured counterpart in terms of equilibrium stability. Stability of the size-structured model is understood in terms of an equivalent delayed system consisting of a renewal equation for the consumer population birth rate and a delayed differential equation for the resource. Results show that the size- and stage-structured models differ considerably with respect to equilibrium stability, although the two models have completely identical equilibrium solutions. First, when adult consumers are superior foragers to juveniles, the size-structured model is more stable than the stagestructured model while the opposite occurs when juveniles are the superior foragers. Second, relatively large juvenile (adult) mortality tends to stabilise (destabilise) the size-structured model but destabilise (stabilise) the stage-structured model. Third, the stability pattern is sensitive to the adult-offspring size ratio in the sizestructured model but much less sensitive in the stage-structured model. Finally, unless the adult-offspring size ratio is sufficiently small, the stage-structured model cannot satisfactorily capture the dynamics of the size-structured model. We conclude that caution must be taken when the stage-structured population model is applied, although it can consistently translate individual life history and stage-specific differences to the population level.