Abstract
The iron mineralogy of aquifer sediments was described
by chemical extraction techniques. Single-step extractions
including 1 M CaC12, NaAc, oxalate, dithionite, Ti(II1)-
EDTA, 0.5 M HC1,5 M HC1, hot 6 M HC1, and a sequential
extraction by HI and CrIIHC1 were tested on standard
iron minerals and nine aquifer sediments from different
redox environments sampled in a landfill leachate plume.
Ion-exchangeable Fe(I1) is easily quantified by anaerobic
CaClz extraction. A rapid indication of the redox status
of a sediment sample can be achieved by a 0.5 M HC1
extraction. This extraction gives an indication of the
content of amorphous Fe(II1) and reduced Fe(I1) species
such as FeS and FeC03, though the fractions are not
quantified. A good estimate of the iron(II1) oxide content
contributing to the oxidation capacity (OXC) of the
sediment is given by the Ti(II1)-EDTA extraction. The
iron(I1) sulfide species are distinguished as AVS (acid
volatile sulfide, hot 6 M HC1 extraction) and pyrite
(sequential HI and CrIIHC1 extraction). By including a
cold 5 M HC1 extraction, the total distribution of the major
reactive Fe(I1) and Fe(II1) fractions in aquifer sediments
can be assessed.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Environmental Science & Technology (Washington) |
| Volume | 28 |
| Issue number | 9 |
| Pages (from-to) | 1698-1705 |
| ISSN | 0013-936X |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1994 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Speciation of Fe(II) and Fe(III) in Contaminated Aquifer Sediments Using Chemical Extraction Techniques'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver