Social inequality in health, responsibility and egalitarian justice

M. Marchman Andersen, S. Oksbjerg Dalton, J. Lynch, C. Johansen, N. Holtug

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review


Are social inequalities in health unjust when brought about by differences in lifestyle? A widespread idea, luck egalitarianism, is that inequality stemming from individuals free choices is not to be considered unjust, since individuals, presumably, are themselves responsible for such choices. Thus, to the extent that lifestyles are in fact results of free choices, social inequality in health brought about by these choices is not in tension with egalitarian justice. If this is so, then it may put in question the justification of free and equal access to health care and existing medical research priorities. However, personal responsibility is a highly contested issue and in this article we first consider the case for, and second the case against, personal responsibility for health in light of recent developments in philosophical accounts of responsibility and equality. We suggestubut do not fully establishuthat at the most fundamental level people are never responsible in such a way that appeals to individuals own responsibility can justify inequalities in health.
Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Public Health
Issue number1
Pages (from-to)4-8
Publication statusPublished - 2013
Externally publishedYes


Dive into the research topics of 'Social inequality in health, responsibility and egalitarian justice'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this