Social- and Self-perception of Designers’ Professional Identity

Kamila Kunrath, Philip Cash, Maaike Kleinsmann

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Designers’ Professional Identity (DPI) is a social- and self-perceptive construct that describes how designers understand themselves as professionals. DPI guides development throughout a designer’s career by shaping professionalism, role assumptions, responsibilities, values and behaviour. DPI links two sets of elements: Personal Attributes and Design Skills. However, little is known about how designers perceive themselves in comparison to other critical actors affecting DPI: educators and managers. While differing perceptions between educators and managers is acknowledged, there is a critical need for more detailed understanding of these differences in comparison to how designers perceive themselves. This study uses semi-structured interviews with designers, design professors, and design managers to shed light on differences in perception of DPI. Analysis of the data highlights critical differences between the three groups. We described these differences with respect to three thematic perspectives on DPI: Technique, Creativity and Rapport. This provides important contributions to understanding DPI, with implications for education and practice.
Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Engineering Design
Number of pages43
ISSN0954-4828
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 2020

Cite this

@article{7a7244ad31ba4b8fb104c57f55ee491f,
title = "Social- and Self-perception of Designers’ Professional Identity",
abstract = "Designers’ Professional Identity (DPI) is a social- and self-perceptive construct that describes how designers understand themselves as professionals. DPI guides development throughout a designer’s career by shaping professionalism, role assumptions, responsibilities, values and behaviour. DPI links two sets of elements: Personal Attributes and Design Skills. However, little is known about how designers perceive themselves in comparison to other critical actors affecting DPI: educators and managers. While differing perceptions between educators and managers is acknowledged, there is a critical need for more detailed understanding of these differences in comparison to how designers perceive themselves. This study uses semi-structured interviews with designers, design professors, and design managers to shed light on differences in perception of DPI. Analysis of the data highlights critical differences between the three groups. We described these differences with respect to three thematic perspectives on DPI: Technique, Creativity and Rapport. This provides important contributions to understanding DPI, with implications for education and practice.",
author = "Kamila Kunrath and Philip Cash and Maaike Kleinsmann",
year = "2020",
doi = "10.1080/09544828.2019.1676883",
language = "English",
journal = "Journal of Engineering Design",
issn = "0954-4828",
publisher = "CRC Press/Balkema",

}

Social- and Self-perception of Designers’ Professional Identity. / Kunrath, Kamila; Cash, Philip; Kleinsmann, Maaike.

In: Journal of Engineering Design, 2020.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Social- and Self-perception of Designers’ Professional Identity

AU - Kunrath, Kamila

AU - Cash, Philip

AU - Kleinsmann, Maaike

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

N2 - Designers’ Professional Identity (DPI) is a social- and self-perceptive construct that describes how designers understand themselves as professionals. DPI guides development throughout a designer’s career by shaping professionalism, role assumptions, responsibilities, values and behaviour. DPI links two sets of elements: Personal Attributes and Design Skills. However, little is known about how designers perceive themselves in comparison to other critical actors affecting DPI: educators and managers. While differing perceptions between educators and managers is acknowledged, there is a critical need for more detailed understanding of these differences in comparison to how designers perceive themselves. This study uses semi-structured interviews with designers, design professors, and design managers to shed light on differences in perception of DPI. Analysis of the data highlights critical differences between the three groups. We described these differences with respect to three thematic perspectives on DPI: Technique, Creativity and Rapport. This provides important contributions to understanding DPI, with implications for education and practice.

AB - Designers’ Professional Identity (DPI) is a social- and self-perceptive construct that describes how designers understand themselves as professionals. DPI guides development throughout a designer’s career by shaping professionalism, role assumptions, responsibilities, values and behaviour. DPI links two sets of elements: Personal Attributes and Design Skills. However, little is known about how designers perceive themselves in comparison to other critical actors affecting DPI: educators and managers. While differing perceptions between educators and managers is acknowledged, there is a critical need for more detailed understanding of these differences in comparison to how designers perceive themselves. This study uses semi-structured interviews with designers, design professors, and design managers to shed light on differences in perception of DPI. Analysis of the data highlights critical differences between the three groups. We described these differences with respect to three thematic perspectives on DPI: Technique, Creativity and Rapport. This provides important contributions to understanding DPI, with implications for education and practice.

U2 - 10.1080/09544828.2019.1676883

DO - 10.1080/09544828.2019.1676883

M3 - Journal article

JO - Journal of Engineering Design

JF - Journal of Engineering Design

SN - 0954-4828

ER -