Abstract
Here we compare the performance of an EMCCD-based imaging system with the standard laser-based
single-grain Risø attachment. We first compare gamma dose distributions and the relative sensitivity
of the two instruments is investigated using a single sample, by comparing the number of grains
accepted into a dose distribution. EMCCD cross-talk is shown to be of concern at low light levels.We also
make use of the fact that the EMCCD can observe TL signals from individual grains to examine the use of
the correlation between the quartz 110 C TL peak and the fast component OSL signal to correct for
sensitivity change. Finally, we present the OSL dose distributions from a set of both well-bleached and
poorly-bleached sedimentary samples. From a comparison of the measured doses, we conclude that the
two instruments give indistinguishable dose estimates and dispersions, despite the fact that the laser-based
system is effectively about four times as sensitive as the EMCCD.
© 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Journal | Radiation Measurements |
Volume | 81 |
Pages (from-to) | 185–191 |
ISSN | 1350-4487 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2015 |
Event | 14th International Conference on Luminescence and Electron Spin Resonance Dating - Montréal, Canada Duration: 7 Jul 2015 → 11 Jul 2015 Conference number: 14 |
Conference
Conference | 14th International Conference on Luminescence and Electron Spin Resonance Dating |
---|---|
Number | 14 |
Country/Territory | Canada |
City | Montréal |
Period | 07/07/2015 → 11/07/2015 |
Keywords
- EMCCD imaging
- OSL
- TL
- Quartz
- Single-grain