Abstract
This paper investigates if the influence on image
quality using physical transducers can be simulated with an
sufficient accuracy to reveal system performance. The influence is
investigated in a comparative study between Synthetic Aperture
Sequential Beamformation (SASB) and Dynamic Receive Focus
(DRF). The study is performed as a series of simulations and validated
by measurements. The influence from individual element
impulse response, phase, and amplitude deviations are quantized
by the lateral resolution (LR) at Full Width at Half Maximum
(FWHM), Full Width at One-Tenth Maximum (FWOTM), and
at Full Width at One-Hundredth Maximum (FWOHM) of 9
points spread functions resulting from evenly distributed point
targets at depths ranging from 10 mm to 90 mm. The results are
documented for a 64 channel system, using a 192 element linear
array transducer model. A physical BK Medical 8804 transducer
is modeled by incorporating measured element pulse echo
responses into the simulation software. Validation is performed
through measurements on a water phantom with three metal
wires, each with a diameter of 0.07 mm. Results show that when
comparing measurement and simulation, the lateral beam profile
using SASB can be estimated with a correlation coefficient of 0.97.
Further, it is shown that SASB successfully maintains a constant
LR though depth at FWHM, and is a factor of 2.3 better than
DRF at 80 mm. However, when using SASB the LR at FWOHM
is affected by non-ideal element responses. Introducing amplitude
and phase compensation, the LR at FWOHM improves from
6.3 mm to 4.7 mm and is a factor of 2.2 better than DRF. This
study has shown that individual element impulse response, phase,
and amplitude deviations are important to include in simulated
system performance evaluations. Furthermore, it is shown that
SASB provides a constant LR through depth and has improved
resolution and contrast compared to DRF.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Proceedings of IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium |
| Publication date | 2010 |
| Pages | 1739-1742 |
| Article number | 5935765 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2010 |
| Event | 2010 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium - San Diego, United States Duration: 11 Oct 2010 → 14 Oct 2010 http://ewh.ieee.org/conf/ius_2010/ https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/conhome/5875051/proceeding |
Conference
| Conference | 2010 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium |
|---|---|
| Country/Territory | United States |
| City | San Diego |
| Period | 11/10/2010 → 14/10/2010 |
| Internet address |
Bibliographical note
Copyright 2010 IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted. However, permission to reprint/republish this material for advertising or promotional purposes or for creating new collective works for resale or redistribution to servers or lists, or to reuse any copyrighted component of this work in other works must be obtained from the IEEE.Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Simulation of High Quality Ultrasound Imaging'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver