Abstract
There is a growing interest in developing environmentally-friendly
substitution for Portland cement in soil stabilization. This study
evaluated the feasibility of using volcanic ash (VA)-based geopolymer as
an alternative soil stabilizer to cement by comparing their shear
strength behavior and life cycle assessment (LCA). The effects of curing
conditions, vertical confinements, binder contents, and alkali
activator properties were investigated. The results revealed that
regardless of the type of binder, increasing binder content changes the
structure of clayey soil through aggregation, thus improves the shear
resistance. The interparticle bonds developed faster at higher curing
temperatures, and the interlocking of the particles increased at higher
confining pressures. Based on the determined boundary conditions, the
LCA suggested a comparative environmental impact for both binders to
stabilize 1 m3 functional unit of clayey soil with similar shear strength.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 100639 |
| Journal | Transportation Geotechnics |
| Volume | 31 |
| Number of pages | 10 |
| ISSN | 2214-3912 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2021 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy
-
SDG 12 Responsible Consumption and Production
Keywords
- Shear strength
- Geopolymer
- Soil stabilization
- Cement
- Clay
- Volcanic ash
- Life cycle assessment
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Shear strength and life cycle assessment of volcanic ash-based geopolymer and cement stabilized soil: a comparative study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver