Abstract
Marine scientists have an alarming habit of attributing carbon sequestration to processes that really only relate to the turnover of long-lived natural carbon pools. This conflicts with the general understanding that carbon sequestration implies a potential offset to anthropogenic emissions. Without a critical re-examination of the terminology used, we run the risk of seriously damaging an informed political debate on climate action from carbon trading to marine CO2 removal strategies, as well as undermining our credibility.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Limnology And Oceanography Letters |
| Volume | 10 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| Pages (from-to) | 851-858 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| ISSN | 2378-2242 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2025 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 13 Climate Action
-
SDG 14 Life Below Water
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Sequestration by the biological carbon pump: Do we really know what we are talking about?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver