Abstract
We compare two popular scenario tree generation methods in the context of financial optimization: moment matching and scenario reduction. Using a simple problem with a known analytic solution, moment matching-when ensuring absence of arbitrage-replicates this solution precisely. On the other hand, even if the scenario trees generated by scenario reduction are arbitrage-free, the solutions are biased and highly variable. These results hold for correlated and uncorrelated asset returns, as well as for normal and non-normal returns. © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Operations Research Letters |
| Volume | 41 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| Pages (from-to) | 494-498 |
| ISSN | 0167-6377 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2013 |
Keywords
- Scenario trees
- No-arbitrage
- Financial optimization
- Moment matching
- Scenario reduction
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Scenario tree generation and multi-asset financial optimization problems'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver