Risk of consuming products with or without precautionary wheat or gluten labelling for persons with coeliac disease

Sisse Nygaard Rasmussen, Håkan Vigre, Charlotte Bernhard Madsen*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

71 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Persons with Coeliac disease (CD) need to keep a lifelong diet without gluten and therefore need to know which foods are safe to eat. The objective of this study was to analyse ordinary foods products without gluten containing ingredients (PWG) with or without the precautionary allergen statement (PAL) “May contain wheat/gluten” or similar wording and use these data to perform a probabilistic risk assessment. Foods with and without PAL were analysed for gluten. Inputs for the risk assessment were analytical results, daily food consumption and data from a 90-days challenge study in coeliac patients (Catassi et al., 2007).20/77 products with PAL and 10/51 without PAL had gluten ≥5 mg/kg 3/77 with PAL and 3/51 without PAL had gluten ≥20 mg/kg. A coconut cookie brand was outlier with 421 mg gluten/kg. The likelihood of developing mucosal damage in the CD population when eating the same PWG for 90 days in addition to certified gluten-free products was low (0.2–3.2%) with little difference between with or without PAL. Including the coconut cookie results increased the risk to 3.8–9.2%.

Caution should be taken in connection to foods where there is an obvious chance of contamination.
Original languageEnglish
Article number113231
JournalFood and Chemical Toxicology
Volume166
Number of pages8
ISSN0278-6915
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2022

Keywords

  • Coeliac disease
  • Gluten
  • Processed food
  • Precautionary labelling
  • Probabilistic risk assessment

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Risk of consuming products with or without precautionary wheat or gluten labelling for persons with coeliac disease'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this