Resilience in Product Design and Development Processes: A Risk Management Viewpoint

Ali Shafqat*, Torgeir Welo, Josef Oehmen, Pelle Lundquist Willumsen, Morten Wied

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalConference articleResearchpeer-review

19 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Product development (PD) faces uncertainties caused by rapidly developing technologies, shifting market demands and the changes occasioned by these developments, including new requirements for products being developed and increased difficulty for companies to reliably execute state-of-the-art processes. In this paper, we argue that classic PD risk management methods and tools are based on the ‘predict and plan’ paradigm, which assumes that organisation members involved in PD have sufficient time and resources to identify, analyse and mitigating technology risks and organisational risks. However, the reality of product development is that time and resources are rarely sufficient, and uncertainty is currently being introduced to the development process at an accelerated rate by trends such as pervasive digitalisation. This paper therefore investigates a resilience-inspired approach to PD risk management that abandons the predict and plan paradigm in favour of a ‘monitor and adapt’ approach. We argue that, in industrial practice, predict and plan approach is the de facto risk management baseline, and suggest deliberately tailoring risk management and PD processes to incorporate resilience-based practices. To that end, we provide suggestions for process frameworks and tools organisations may adopt and discuss how resilience and risk management are complementary approaches to traditional PD. Our arguments are supported by a case study of an engineering organisation and additional interviews conducted with members of similar organisations for purposes of validation.
Original languageEnglish
JournalProcedia CIRP
Volume84
Pages (from-to)412-418
ISSN2212-8271
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019
Event29th CIRP Design - Póvoa de Varzim, Portugal
Duration: 8 May 201910 May 2019

Conference

Conference29th CIRP Design
CountryPortugal
CityPóvoa de Varzim
Period08/05/201910/05/2019

Cite this

@inproceedings{46da331b2fe046bc9dd4c854f9ac3a27,
title = "Resilience in Product Design and Development Processes: A Risk Management Viewpoint",
abstract = "Product development (PD) faces uncertainties caused by rapidly developing technologies, shifting market demands and the changes occasioned by these developments, including new requirements for products being developed and increased difficulty for companies to reliably execute state-of-the-art processes. In this paper, we argue that classic PD risk management methods and tools are based on the ‘predict and plan’ paradigm, which assumes that organisation members involved in PD have sufficient time and resources to identify, analyse and mitigating technology risks and organisational risks. However, the reality of product development is that time and resources are rarely sufficient, and uncertainty is currently being introduced to the development process at an accelerated rate by trends such as pervasive digitalisation. This paper therefore investigates a resilience-inspired approach to PD risk management that abandons the predict and plan paradigm in favour of a ‘monitor and adapt’ approach. We argue that, in industrial practice, predict and plan approach is the de facto risk management baseline, and suggest deliberately tailoring risk management and PD processes to incorporate resilience-based practices. To that end, we provide suggestions for process frameworks and tools organisations may adopt and discuss how resilience and risk management are complementary approaches to traditional PD. Our arguments are supported by a case study of an engineering organisation and additional interviews conducted with members of similar organisations for purposes of validation.",
author = "Ali Shafqat and Torgeir Welo and Josef Oehmen and Willumsen, {Pelle Lundquist} and Morten Wied",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1016/j.procir.2019.04.248",
language = "English",
volume = "84",
pages = "412--418",
journal = "Procedia CIRP",
issn = "2212-8271",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Resilience in Product Design and Development Processes: A Risk Management Viewpoint. / Shafqat, Ali; Welo, Torgeir; Oehmen, Josef; Willumsen, Pelle Lundquist; Wied, Morten.

In: Procedia CIRP, Vol. 84, 2019, p. 412-418.

Research output: Contribution to journalConference articleResearchpeer-review

TY - GEN

T1 - Resilience in Product Design and Development Processes: A Risk Management Viewpoint

AU - Shafqat, Ali

AU - Welo, Torgeir

AU - Oehmen, Josef

AU - Willumsen, Pelle Lundquist

AU - Wied, Morten

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Product development (PD) faces uncertainties caused by rapidly developing technologies, shifting market demands and the changes occasioned by these developments, including new requirements for products being developed and increased difficulty for companies to reliably execute state-of-the-art processes. In this paper, we argue that classic PD risk management methods and tools are based on the ‘predict and plan’ paradigm, which assumes that organisation members involved in PD have sufficient time and resources to identify, analyse and mitigating technology risks and organisational risks. However, the reality of product development is that time and resources are rarely sufficient, and uncertainty is currently being introduced to the development process at an accelerated rate by trends such as pervasive digitalisation. This paper therefore investigates a resilience-inspired approach to PD risk management that abandons the predict and plan paradigm in favour of a ‘monitor and adapt’ approach. We argue that, in industrial practice, predict and plan approach is the de facto risk management baseline, and suggest deliberately tailoring risk management and PD processes to incorporate resilience-based practices. To that end, we provide suggestions for process frameworks and tools organisations may adopt and discuss how resilience and risk management are complementary approaches to traditional PD. Our arguments are supported by a case study of an engineering organisation and additional interviews conducted with members of similar organisations for purposes of validation.

AB - Product development (PD) faces uncertainties caused by rapidly developing technologies, shifting market demands and the changes occasioned by these developments, including new requirements for products being developed and increased difficulty for companies to reliably execute state-of-the-art processes. In this paper, we argue that classic PD risk management methods and tools are based on the ‘predict and plan’ paradigm, which assumes that organisation members involved in PD have sufficient time and resources to identify, analyse and mitigating technology risks and organisational risks. However, the reality of product development is that time and resources are rarely sufficient, and uncertainty is currently being introduced to the development process at an accelerated rate by trends such as pervasive digitalisation. This paper therefore investigates a resilience-inspired approach to PD risk management that abandons the predict and plan paradigm in favour of a ‘monitor and adapt’ approach. We argue that, in industrial practice, predict and plan approach is the de facto risk management baseline, and suggest deliberately tailoring risk management and PD processes to incorporate resilience-based practices. To that end, we provide suggestions for process frameworks and tools organisations may adopt and discuss how resilience and risk management are complementary approaches to traditional PD. Our arguments are supported by a case study of an engineering organisation and additional interviews conducted with members of similar organisations for purposes of validation.

U2 - 10.1016/j.procir.2019.04.248

DO - 10.1016/j.procir.2019.04.248

M3 - Conference article

VL - 84

SP - 412

EP - 418

JO - Procedia CIRP

JF - Procedia CIRP

SN - 2212-8271

ER -