Reply to the comments by Madsen & Liu on “Late quaternary OSL chronologies from the Qinghai Lake (NE Tibetan Plateau): Inter-comparison of quartz and K-feldspar ages to assess the pre-depositional bleaching”

Hao Long; Sumiko Tsukamoto; Jan-Pieter Buylaert; Andrew Sean Murray; Mayank Jain; Manfred Frechen

doi:10.1016/j.quageo.2018.11.003

Reply to the comments by Madsen & Liu on “Late quaternary OSL chronologies from the Qinghai Lake (NE Tibetan Plateau): Inter-comparison of quartz and K-feldspar ages to assess the pre-depositional bleaching”

Hao Long^*, Sumiko Tsukamoto, Jan-Pieter Buylaert, Andrew Sean Murray, Mayank Jain, Manfred Frechen

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › Research › peer-review

94 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In response to the comment of Madsen and Liu (2018), we explain why our quartz optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) ages showing the early MIS 3 lake highstand are robust. We also demonstrate that the difference in the age estimates between ours (Long et al., 2018) and other studies should be attributed to contrasting equivalent dose (D_e) values, rather than water contents (hence the dose rate) which was claimed by Madsen and Liu (2018).

Original language	English
Journal	Quaternary Geochronology
Volume	50
Pages (from-to)	14-15
ISSN	1871-1014
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quageo.2018.11.003
Publication status	Published - 2019

Access to Document

10.1016/j.quageo.2018.11.003

Pesei 1 s2Accepted author manuscript, 392 KBLicence: CC BY-NC-ND

OpenUrl availability

Full text

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Reply to the comments by Madsen & Liu on “Late quaternary OSL chronologies from the Qinghai Lake (NE Tibetan Plateau): Inter-comparison of quartz and K-feldspar ages to assess the pre-depositional bleaching”'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

Long, H., Tsukamoto, S., Buylaert, J-P., Murray, A. S., Jain, M., & Frechen, M. (2019). Reply to the comments by Madsen & Liu on “Late quaternary OSL chronologies from the Qinghai Lake (NE Tibetan Plateau): Inter-comparison of quartz and K-feldspar ages to assess the pre-depositional bleaching”. Quaternary Geochronology, 50, 14-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quageo.2018.11.003

@article{da1b724eb448459d8290c33622eb7727,

title = "Reply to the comments by Madsen & Liu on “Late quaternary OSL chronologies from the Qinghai Lake (NE Tibetan Plateau): Inter-comparison of quartz and K-feldspar ages to assess the pre-depositional bleaching”",

abstract = "In response to the comment of Madsen and Liu (2018), we explain why our quartz optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) ages showing the early MIS 3 lake highstand are robust. We also demonstrate that the difference in the age estimates between ours (Long et al., 2018) and other studies should be attributed to contrasting equivalent dose (De) values, rather than water contents (hence the dose rate) which was claimed by Madsen and Liu (2018).",

author = "Hao Long and Sumiko Tsukamoto and Jan-Pieter Buylaert and Murray, {Andrew Sean} and Mayank Jain and Manfred Frechen",

year = "2019",

doi = "10.1016/j.quageo.2018.11.003",

language = "English",

volume = "50",

pages = "14--15",

journal = "Quaternary Geochronology",

issn = "1871-1014",

publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Long, H, Tsukamoto, S, Buylaert, J-P, Murray, AS, Jain, M & Frechen, M 2019, 'Reply to the comments by Madsen & Liu on “Late quaternary OSL chronologies from the Qinghai Lake (NE Tibetan Plateau): Inter-comparison of quartz and K-feldspar ages to assess the pre-depositional bleaching”', Quaternary Geochronology, vol. 50, pp. 14-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quageo.2018.11.003

Reply to the comments by Madsen & Liu on “Late quaternary OSL chronologies from the Qinghai Lake (NE Tibetan Plateau): Inter-comparison of quartz and K-feldspar ages to assess the pre-depositional bleaching”. / Long, Hao; Tsukamoto, Sumiko; Buylaert, Jan-Pieter et al.
In: Quaternary Geochronology, Vol. 50, 2019, p. 14-15.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › Research › peer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reply to the comments by Madsen & Liu on “Late quaternary OSL chronologies from the Qinghai Lake (NE Tibetan Plateau): Inter-comparison of quartz and K-feldspar ages to assess the pre-depositional bleaching”

AU - Long, Hao

AU - Tsukamoto, Sumiko

AU - Buylaert, Jan-Pieter

AU - Murray, Andrew Sean

AU - Jain, Mayank

AU - Frechen, Manfred

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - In response to the comment of Madsen and Liu (2018), we explain why our quartz optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) ages showing the early MIS 3 lake highstand are robust. We also demonstrate that the difference in the age estimates between ours (Long et al., 2018) and other studies should be attributed to contrasting equivalent dose (De) values, rather than water contents (hence the dose rate) which was claimed by Madsen and Liu (2018).

AB - In response to the comment of Madsen and Liu (2018), we explain why our quartz optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) ages showing the early MIS 3 lake highstand are robust. We also demonstrate that the difference in the age estimates between ours (Long et al., 2018) and other studies should be attributed to contrasting equivalent dose (De) values, rather than water contents (hence the dose rate) which was claimed by Madsen and Liu (2018).

U2 - 10.1016/j.quageo.2018.11.003

DO - 10.1016/j.quageo.2018.11.003

M3 - Comment/debate

SN - 1871-1014

VL - 50

SP - 14

EP - 15

JO - Quaternary Geochronology

JF - Quaternary Geochronology

ER -