Recalibrating the Risk-Benefit Profiles of Lecanemab and Donanemab: Scales, Immunoreactivity, and Changes in Amyloid-β42

Alberto J. Espay, Karl Herrup, Bruno P. Imbimbo, Kasper P. Kepp, Timothy Daly*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReviewpeer-review

Abstract

Three recent anti-amyloid-β antibody trials for Alzheimer's disease reported similar effect sizes, used non-reactive saline as placebo, and showed large numbers of adverse events including imaging anomalies (ARIA) that correlate with cognitive changes. Conversely, all previous antibody trials were less reactive and pronounced ineffective. We argue that these observations point to unblinding bias, inflating apparent efficacy and thus altering the risk-benefit balance. Further, we highlight data demonstrating that beyond reducing amyloid, monoclonal antibodies increase monomeric amyloid-β42 in cerebrospinal fluid, which may explain potential benefits. We should recalibrate the efficacy of these antibodies and devote more resources into strategies beyond removing amyloid.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Alzheimer's Disease
Volume99
Issue number3
Pages (from-to)877-881
ISSN1387-2877
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2024

Keywords

  • Alzheimer's disease
  • Amyloid-β
  • ARIA
  • Placebo
  • RCT

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Recalibrating the Risk-Benefit Profiles of Lecanemab and Donanemab: Scales, Immunoreactivity, and Changes in Amyloid-β42'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this