Reactivity of alternative supplementary cementitious materials assessed by the R3 method

M. Ranger*, J. Duchesne

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingArticle in proceedingsResearch

Abstract

The necessity to reduce carbon emissions in concrete production has accelerated the partial replacement of Portland cement by Supplementary Cementitious Materials (SCMs). As the range of SCMs studied is constantly expanding, screening tests to evaluate their reactivity have gained considerable attention. One example is the R3 method, which consists in quantifying the chemical reactivity of an SCM in a simplified mixture simulating the environment of a cement paste. Different parameters measured by various techniques have been proposed in previous work: heat release, bound water, portlandite consumption and chemical shrinkage.

In the present study, the R3 method was applied to both traditional and alternative SCMs, to further investigate the validation range of the method. The experimental matrix included limestone, fly ash, calcined clays, biomass ashes, crushed brick, glass beads and sewage sludge ash. Three parameters were measured: heat release by isothermal calorimetry, bound water by oven-drying and portlandite consumption by thermogravimetry. The results indicated that both heat release and bound water correlated well with the relative compressive strength at 28 days, even for alternative SCMs. Thus, the R3 method appears as an efficient screening test to identify promising SCMs. In addition, the study confirmed the potential of bound water, which can be measured with basic equipment available in many laboratories.

As most SCMs were first tested as received, the particle size varied significantly between the materials. Crushing the SCMs did not always improve the reactivity, presumably only when the amorphous part was affected. Finally, the effect of sulphates and carbonates on the reactivity was tested. Both compounds influenced the measured parameters, but no conclusion could be drawn regarding the correlation with the compressive strength. Thus, it is suggested to keep both sulphates and carbonates in the R3 mix design, following the initial idea of mimicking a cement paste environment.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of the 16th International Congress on the Chemistry of Cement
Number of pages4
Volume1
Publication date2023
Pages243-246
Publication statusPublished - 2023
Event16th International Congress on the Chemistry of Cement 2023: Further Reduction of CO2 -Emissions and Circularity in the Cement and Concrete Industry - Centara Grand & Bangkok Convention Centre at Centralworld, Bangkok, Thailand
Duration: 18 Sept 202322 Sept 2023
Conference number: 16
https://www.iccc2023.org/

Conference

Conference16th International Congress on the Chemistry of Cement 2023
Number16
LocationCentara Grand & Bangkok Convention Centre at Centralworld
Country/TerritoryThailand
CityBangkok
Period18/09/202322/09/2023
Internet address

Keywords

  • Reactivity tests
  • Supplementary cementitious materials
  • Heat release
  • Bound water
  • Compressive strength

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Reactivity of alternative supplementary cementitious materials assessed by the R3 method'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this