Quantitative comparison between PW-PSM and PW-TSM Doppler systems

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingArticle in proceedingsResearchpeer-review

    Abstract

    A simulation-based quantitative comparison between pulsed-wave (PW) Doppler systems using the conventional phase-shift measurement (PSM) technique and the newer time-shift measurement (TSM) technique is presented. A PSM system applying an autocorrelator is compared with a TSM system. The performances of the two systems are compared from zero velocity up to a velocity where detection is no longer possible. With increasing velocity, the coherence between consecutive received signals decreases which eventually results in detection of random peaks with TSM. This is illustrated by showing the relative amount of incorrect detections as a function of velocity. Also, the variance (PW-PSM) and the cross-correlation coefficient (PW-TSM) are found
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationIEEE Ultrasonics Symposium Proceedings
    VolumeVolume 2
    PublisherIEEE
    Publication date1991
    Pages1281-1284
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1991
    Event1991 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium - Orlando, United States
    Duration: 8 Dec 199111 Dec 1991
    http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/mostRecentIssue.jsp?punumber=886

    Conference

    Conference1991 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium
    Country/TerritoryUnited States
    CityOrlando
    Period08/12/199111/12/1991
    Internet address

    Bibliographical note

    Copyright: 1991 IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted. However, permission to reprint/republish this material for advertising or promotional purposes or for creating new collective works for resale or redistribution to servers or lists, or to reuse any copyrighted component of this work in other works must be obtained from the IEEE

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Quantitative comparison between PW-PSM and PW-TSM Doppler systems'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this