Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Quantitative approaches in climate change ecology

  • Christopher J. Brown
  • , David S. Schoeman
  • , William J. Sydeman
  • , Keith Brander
  • , Lauren B. Buckley
  • , Michael Burrows
  • , Carlos M. Duarte
  • , Pippa J. Moore
  • , John M. Pandolfi
  • , Elvira Poloczanska
  • , William Venables
  • , Anthony J. Richardson
  • University of Queensland
  • Ulster University
  • Farallon Institute for Advanced Ecosystem Research
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
  • Scottish Association for Marine Science
  • University of Western Australia
  • Edith Cowan University
  • CSIRO

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Contemporary impacts of anthropogenic climate change on ecosystems are increasingly being recognized. Documenting the extent of these impacts requires quantitative tools for analyses of ecological observations to distinguish climate impacts in noisy data and to understand interactions between climate variability and other drivers of change. To assist the development of reliable statistical approaches, we review the marine climate change literature and provide suggestions for quantitative approaches in climate change ecology. We compiled 267 peer‐reviewed articles that examined relationships between climate change and marine ecological variables. Of the articles with time series data (n = 186), 75% used statistics to test for a dependency of ecological variables on climate variables. We identified several common weaknesses in statistical approaches, including marginalizing other important non‐climate drivers of change, ignoring temporal and spatial autocorrelation, averaging across spatial patterns and not reporting key metrics. We provide a list of issues that need to be addressed to make inferences more defensible, including the consideration of (i) data limitations and the comparability of data sets; (ii) alternative mechanisms for change; (iii) appropriate response variables; (iv) a suitable model for the process under study; (v) temporal autocorrelation; (vi) spatial autocorrelation and patterns; and (vii) the reporting of rates of change. While the focus of our review was marine studies, these suggestions are equally applicable to terrestrial studies. Consideration of these suggestions will help advance global knowledge of climate impacts and understanding of the processes driving ecological change.
Original languageEnglish
JournalGlobal Change Biology
Volume17
Issue number12
Pages (from-to)3697-3713
ISSN1354-1013
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 13 - Climate Action
    SDG 13 Climate Action
  2. SDG 14 - Life Below Water
    SDG 14 Life Below Water
  3. SDG 15 - Life on Land
    SDG 15 Life on Land

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Quantitative approaches in climate change ecology'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this