Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Quality criteria for multi-domain studies in the indoor environment: Critical review towards research guidelines and recommendations

  • Giorgia Chinazzo*
  • , Rune Korsholm Andersen
  • , Elie Azar
  • , Verena M. Barthelmes
  • , Cristina Becchio
  • , Lorenzo Belussi
  • , Christiane Berger
  • , Salvatore Carlucci
  • , Stefano Paolo Corgnati
  • , Sarah Crosby
  • , Ludovico Danza
  • , Luiza de Castro
  • , Matteo Favero
  • , Stephanie Gauthier
  • , Runa T. Hellwig
  • , Quan Jin
  • , Joyce Kim
  • , Mandana Sarey Khanie
  • , Dolaana Khovalyg
  • , Carola Lingua
  • Alessandra Luna-Navarro, Ardeshir Mahdavi, Clayton Miller, Isabel Mino-Rodriguez, Ilaria Pigliautile, Anna Laura Pisello, Ricardo Forgiarini Rupp, Abdul-Manan Sadick, Francesco Salamone, Marcel Schweiker, Marc Syndicus, Giorgia Spigliantini, Natalia Giraldo Vasquez, Donna Vakalis, Marika Vellei, Shen Wei
*Corresponding author for this work
  • Northwestern University
  • Carleton University
  • Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Lausanne
  • Polytechnic University of Turin
  • National Research Council of Italy
  • Aalborg University
  • The Cyprus Institute
  • University of British Columbia
  • Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
  • Norwegian University of Science and Technology
  • University of Southampton
  • Chalmers University of Technology
  • University of Waterloo
  • Delft University of Technology
  • TU Wien
  • National University of Singapore
  • Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
  • University of Perugia
  • Deakin University
  • RWTH Aachen University
  • Université de La Rochelle
  • University College London

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review › peer-review

167 Downloads (Orbit)

Abstract

The perception, physiology, behavior, and performance of building occupants are influenced by multi-domain exposures: the simultaneous presence of multiple environmental stimuli, i.e., visual, thermal, acoustic, and air quality. Despite being extensive, the literature on multi-domain exposures presents heterogeneous methodological approaches and inconsistent study reporting, which hinders direct comparison between studies and meta-analyses. Therefore, in addition to carrying out more multi-domain studies, such investigations need to be designed, conducted, and documented in a systematic and transparent way. With the goal to facilitate and support future multi-domain studies and their meta-analyses, this work provides (1) a range of criteria for multi-domain study design and reporting (i.e., defined as quality criteria), and (2) a critical review of the multi-domain literature based on the described criteria, which can serve as guidelines and recommendations for future studies on the topic. The identified quality criteria encompass study set-up, study deployment and analysis, and study outcome, stressing the importance of adopting a consistent terminology and result reporting style. The developed critical review highlights several shortcomings in the design, deployment, and documentation of multi-domain studies, emphasizing the need for quality improvements of future multi-domain research. The ultimate goal of this work is to consolidate our knowledge on multi-domain exposures for its integration into regulatory resources and guidelines, which are currently dominated by single-domain knowledge.
Original languageEnglish
Article number109719
JournalBuilding and Environment
Volume226
Number of pages28
ISSN0360-1323
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2022

Keywords

  • IEQ
  • Human comfort
  • Combined effects
  • Cross-modal effects
  • Transparent reporting
  • Research quality assurance

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Quality criteria for multi-domain studies in the indoor environment: Critical review towards research guidelines and recommendations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this