Pyrolysis and gasification of meat-and-bone-meal: Energy balance and GHG accounting

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

700 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Meat-and-bone-meal (MBM) produced from animal waste has become an increasingly important residual fraction needing management. As biodegradable waste is routed away from landfills, thermo-chemical treatments of MBM are considered promising solution for the future. Pyrolysis and gasification of MBM were assessed based on data from three experimental lab and pilot-scale plants. Energy balances were established for the three technologies, providing different outcomes for energy recovery: bio-oil was the main product for the pyrolysis system, while syngas and a solid fraction of biochar were the main products in the gasification system. These products can be used – eventually after upgrading – for energy production, thereby offsetting energy production elsewhere in the system. Greenhouse gases (GHG) accounting of the technologies showed that all three options provided overall GHG savings in the order of 600–1000kg CO2-eq. per Mg of MBM treated, mainly as a consequence of avoided fossil fuel consumption in the energy sector. Local conditions influencing the environmental performance of the three systems were identified, together with critical factors to be considered during decision-making regarding MBM management.
Original languageEnglish
JournalWaste Management
Volume33
Issue number11
Pages (from-to)2501-2508
ISSN0956-053X
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Keywords

  • Meat-and-bone-meal
  • Pyrolysis
  • Thermal treatment
  • Global warming
  • CO2 accounting
  • Greenhouse gas (GHG) emission

Cite this

@article{3943d0a9aee84a199aed54f9c5158a86,
title = "Pyrolysis and gasification of meat-and-bone-meal: Energy balance and GHG accounting",
abstract = "Meat-and-bone-meal (MBM) produced from animal waste has become an increasingly important residual fraction needing management. As biodegradable waste is routed away from landfills, thermo-chemical treatments of MBM are considered promising solution for the future. Pyrolysis and gasification of MBM were assessed based on data from three experimental lab and pilot-scale plants. Energy balances were established for the three technologies, providing different outcomes for energy recovery: bio-oil was the main product for the pyrolysis system, while syngas and a solid fraction of biochar were the main products in the gasification system. These products can be used – eventually after upgrading – for energy production, thereby offsetting energy production elsewhere in the system. Greenhouse gases (GHG) accounting of the technologies showed that all three options provided overall GHG savings in the order of 600–1000kg CO2-eq. per Mg of MBM treated, mainly as a consequence of avoided fossil fuel consumption in the energy sector. Local conditions influencing the environmental performance of the three systems were identified, together with critical factors to be considered during decision-making regarding MBM management.",
keywords = "Meat-and-bone-meal, Pyrolysis, Thermal treatment, Global warming, CO2 accounting, Greenhouse gas (GHG) emission",
author = "Esther Cascarosa and Alessio Boldrin and Astrup, {Thomas Fruergaard}",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1016/j.wasman.2013.07.014",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "2501--2508",
journal = "Waste Management",
issn = "0956-053X",
publisher = "Pergamon Press",
number = "11",

}

Pyrolysis and gasification of meat-and-bone-meal: Energy balance and GHG accounting. / Cascarosa, Esther; Boldrin, Alessio; Astrup, Thomas Fruergaard.

In: Waste Management, Vol. 33, No. 11, 2013, p. 2501-2508.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pyrolysis and gasification of meat-and-bone-meal: Energy balance and GHG accounting

AU - Cascarosa, Esther

AU - Boldrin, Alessio

AU - Astrup, Thomas Fruergaard

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Meat-and-bone-meal (MBM) produced from animal waste has become an increasingly important residual fraction needing management. As biodegradable waste is routed away from landfills, thermo-chemical treatments of MBM are considered promising solution for the future. Pyrolysis and gasification of MBM were assessed based on data from three experimental lab and pilot-scale plants. Energy balances were established for the three technologies, providing different outcomes for energy recovery: bio-oil was the main product for the pyrolysis system, while syngas and a solid fraction of biochar were the main products in the gasification system. These products can be used – eventually after upgrading – for energy production, thereby offsetting energy production elsewhere in the system. Greenhouse gases (GHG) accounting of the technologies showed that all three options provided overall GHG savings in the order of 600–1000kg CO2-eq. per Mg of MBM treated, mainly as a consequence of avoided fossil fuel consumption in the energy sector. Local conditions influencing the environmental performance of the three systems were identified, together with critical factors to be considered during decision-making regarding MBM management.

AB - Meat-and-bone-meal (MBM) produced from animal waste has become an increasingly important residual fraction needing management. As biodegradable waste is routed away from landfills, thermo-chemical treatments of MBM are considered promising solution for the future. Pyrolysis and gasification of MBM were assessed based on data from three experimental lab and pilot-scale plants. Energy balances were established for the three technologies, providing different outcomes for energy recovery: bio-oil was the main product for the pyrolysis system, while syngas and a solid fraction of biochar were the main products in the gasification system. These products can be used – eventually after upgrading – for energy production, thereby offsetting energy production elsewhere in the system. Greenhouse gases (GHG) accounting of the technologies showed that all three options provided overall GHG savings in the order of 600–1000kg CO2-eq. per Mg of MBM treated, mainly as a consequence of avoided fossil fuel consumption in the energy sector. Local conditions influencing the environmental performance of the three systems were identified, together with critical factors to be considered during decision-making regarding MBM management.

KW - Meat-and-bone-meal

KW - Pyrolysis

KW - Thermal treatment

KW - Global warming

KW - CO2 accounting

KW - Greenhouse gas (GHG) emission

U2 - 10.1016/j.wasman.2013.07.014

DO - 10.1016/j.wasman.2013.07.014

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 23916845

VL - 33

SP - 2501

EP - 2508

JO - Waste Management

JF - Waste Management

SN - 0956-053X

IS - 11

ER -