Abstract
Major countermeasures in the late phase of a nuclear or radiological accident where long-lived radionuclides have been dispersed in the environment are relocation/resettlement, foodstuff restrictions, agricultural countermeasures and clean-up of contaminated areas. There has essentially been a broad acceptance internationally of the principles for their introduction, but it has not been possible to reach an agreement for the purpose of defining a net benefit based upon the exact weighting to be attached to each of the attributes influencing the decision on intervention, e.g. socio-psychological attributes. Optimisation of protection, i.e. maximising the net benefit, is not a question of developing radiation protection philosophy to fully include socio-psychological factors but rather to include these factors-in parallel with the radiological protection factors-in cooperation between radiation protection experts and e.g. experts in social and psychological sciences under the responsibility of the decision-maker, who will take the final decision on the introduction of long-term countermeasures.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Radiation Protection Dosimetry |
| Volume | 109 |
| Issue number | 1-2 |
| Pages (from-to) | 45-51 |
| ISSN | 0144-8420 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2004 |
| Event | International Symposium on Off-Site Nuclear Emergency Management: Capabilities and challenges - Salzburg, Austria Duration: 29 Sept 2003 → 3 Oct 2003 |
Conference
| Conference | International Symposium on Off-Site Nuclear Emergency Management |
|---|---|
| Country/Territory | Austria |
| City | Salzburg |
| Period | 29/09/2003 → 03/10/2003 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Protective actions in the late phase - intervention criteria and decision-making'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver