Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Proposals to overcome limitations in the EU chemical risk assessment scheme

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

    Abstract

    The noti®cation of new chemicals in the European Union requires a risk assessment. A Technical Guidance Document (TGD) was prepared for assistance. The TGD proposes QSARs, regressions and models from various sources. Each method has its own range of applicability and its own restrictions. Regressions used in the assessment of indirect human exposure have a common regression range from log KOW 3.0±4.6. Most models are compartment models, which do not consider a spatial distribution of the chemical, and were originally developed for non-dissociating, lipophilic persistent chemicals with measurable vapor pressure. Taking this into account, the TGD is only applicable for a minority of chemical classes. Dissociating compounds, ions, polar and very non-polar compounds do not belong to them. The e€ect of mixtures cannot be considered, except for hydrocarbons. Using the example of plant uptake, it is shown that in certain cases uptake is underestimated by the model due to processes not considered. This may lead to a wrong security in risk assessment. To overcome these limitations, a set of alternative models with di€erent application ranges should be developed. When no applicable method is available, it might be better not to use a model at all instead of an inadequate model, and look for other sources of information. Ó 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
    Original languageEnglish
    JournalChemosphere
    Volume41
    Issue number7
    Pages (from-to)965-971
    ISSN0045-6535
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2000

    Keywords

    • exposure models
    • risk assessment
    • plant uptake
    • EUSES
    • TGD

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Proposals to overcome limitations in the EU chemical risk assessment scheme'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this